Molecular PsychiatryNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Altered functional brain dynamics in chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome during facial affect processing
Eli J. CornblathiD, Arun S. MahadevaniD, Xiaosong HeiD, Kosha RupareliD, David M. Lydon‐StaleyiD, Tyler M. MooreiD, Ruben C. GuriD, Elaine H. ZackaiiD, Beverly S. EmanueliD, Donna M. McDonald‐McGinniD, Daniel H. WolfiD, Theodore Daniel SatterthwaiteiD, David R. RoalfiD, Raquel E. GuriD, Dani S. BassettiD
Abstract
Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is a multisystem disorder associated with multiple congenital anomalies, variable medical features, and neurodevelopmental differences resulting in diverse psychiatric phenotypes, including marked deficits in facial memory and social cognition. Neuroimaging in individuals with 22q11.2DS has revealed differences relative to matched controls in BOLD fMRI activation during facial affect processing tasks, but time-varying interactions between brain areas during facial affect processing have not yet been studied in 22q11.2DS. We applied constrained principal component analysis to identify temporally overlapping brain activation patterns from BOLD fMRI data acquired during an emotion identification task from 58 individuals with 22q11.2DS and 58 age-, race-, and sex-matched healthy controls. Delayed frontal-motor feedback signals were diminished in individuals with 22q11.2DS, as were delayed emotional memory signals engaging amygdala, hippocampus, and entorhinal cortex. Early task-related engagement of motor and visual cortices and salience-related insular activation were relatively preserved in 22q11.2DS. Insular activation was associated with task performance within the 22q11.2DS sample. Differences in cortical surface area, but not cortical thickness, showed spatial alignment with an activation pattern associated with face processing. These findings suggest that relative to matched controls, primary visual processing and insular function are relatively intact in individuals with 22q11.22DS, while motor feedback, face processing, and emotional memory processes are more affected. Such insights may help inform potential interventional targets and enhance the specificity of neuroimaging indices of cognitive dysfunction in 22q11.2DS.
- organism: human
- assay: multiome
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.99
- Field percentile
- top 26%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Atypical response inhibition and error processing in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome and Schizophrenia: Towards neuromarkers of disease progression and risk
Ana A. Francisco, Douwe J. Horsthuis, … Sophie Molholm·NeuroImage ClinicalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- Synaptic-dependent developmental dysconnectivity in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
Filomena Grazia Alvino, Silvia Gini, … Alessandro Gozzi·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Mar 12, 2025
- Longitudinal development of thalamocortical functional connectivity in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
Charles H. Schleifer, Kathleen O’Hora, … Carrie E. Bearden·Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and NeuroimagingPeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2023
- Reciprocal Disruptions in Thalamic and Hippocampal Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Youth with 22q11.2 Deletions
Charles H. Schleifer, Amy Lin, … Alan Anticevic·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2017
- Assessing auditory processing endophenotypes associated with Schizophrenia in individuals with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
Ana A. Francisco, John J. Foxe, … Sophie Molholm·Translational PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Mar 5, 2020
- Large-scale brain network dynamics provide a measure of psychosis and anxiety in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.
Daniela Zöller, Corrado Sandini, … Dimitri Van De Ville·Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and NeuroimagingPeer-reviewed·Apr 16, 2019