Predicting coordinates of peptide features in raw timsTOF data with machine learning for targeted extraction reduces missing values in label-free DDA LC-MS/MS proteomics experiments
Daryl Wilding‐McBrideiD, Giuseppe InfusiniiD, Andrew Ian WebbiD
Abstract
1The determination of relative protein abundance in label-free data dependant acquisition (DDA) LC-MS/MS proteomics experiments is hindered by the stochastic nature of peptide detection and identification. Peptides with an abundance near the limit of detection are particularly effected. The possible causes of missing values are numerous, including; sample preparation, variation in sample composition and the corresponding matrix effects, instrument and analysis software settings, instrument and LC variability, and the tolerances used for database searching. There have been many approaches proposed to computationally address the missing values problem, predominantly based on transferring identifications from one run to another by data realignment, as in MaxQuants matching between runs (MBR) method, and/or statistical imputation. Imputation transfers identifications by statistical estimation of the likelihood the peptide is present based on its presence in other technical replicates but without probing the raw data for evidence. Here we present a targeted extraction approach to resolving missing values without modifying or realigning the raw data. Our method, which forms part of an end-to-end timsTOF processing pipeline we developed called Targeted Feature Detection and Extraction (TFD/E), predicts the coordinates of peptides using machine learning models that learn the delta of each peptides coordinates from a reference library. The models learn the variability of a peptides location in 3D space from the variability of known peptide locations around it. Rather than realigning or altering the raw data, we create a run-specific lens through which to observe the data, targeting a location for each peptide of interest and extracting it. By also creating a method for extracting decoys, we can estimate the false discovery rate (FDR). Our method outperforms MaxQuant and MSFragger by achieving substantially fewer missing values across an experiment of technical replicates. The software has been developed in Python using Numpy and Pandas and open sourced with an MIT license (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.6513126) to provide the opportunity for further improvement and experimentation by the community. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD030706. 2 Author SummaryMissed identifications of peptides in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) proteomics experiments are an obstacle to the precise determination of which proteins are present in a sample and their relative abundance. Efforts to address the problem in popular analysis workflows include realigning the raw data to transfer a peptide identification from one run to another. Another approach is statistically analysing peptide identifications across an experiment to impute peptide identifications in runs in which they were missing. We propose a targeted extraction technique that uses machine learning models to construct a run-specific lens through which to examine the raw data and predict the coordinates of a peptide in a run. The models are trained on differences between observations of confidently identified peptides in a run and a reference library of peptide observations collated from multiple experiments. To minimise the risk of drawing unsound experimental conclusions based on an unknown rate of false discoveries, our method provides a mechanism for estimating the false discovery rate (FDR) based on the misclassification of decoys as target features. Our approach outperforms the popular analysis tool suites MaxQuant and MSFragger/IonQuant, and we believe it will be a valuable contribution to the proteomics toolbox for protein quantification.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- MSImpute: Imputation of label-free mass spectrometry peptides by low-rank approximation
Soroor Hediyeh-zadeh, Andrew Ian Webb, Melissa J. Davis·bioRxiv·Aug 12, 2020
- A de novo MS1 feature detector for the Bruker timsTOF Pro
Daryl Wilding‐McBride, Andrew Ian Webb·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2022
- proDA: Probabilistic Dropout Analysis for Identifying Differentially Abundant Proteins in Label-Free Mass Spectrometry
Constantin Ahlmann-Eltze, Simon Anders·bioRxiv·May 1, 2020
- Imputation of label-free quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics data using self-supervised deep learning
Henry Emanuel Webel, Lili Niu, … Simon Rasmussen·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 26, 2024
- A Simple Optimization Workflow to Enable Precise and Accurate Imputation of Missing Values in Proteomic Datasets
Kruttika Dabke, Simion D. Kreimer, … Sarah J. Parker·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 3, 2021
- Simplifying MS1 and MS2 spectra to achieve lower mass error, more dynamic range, and higher peptide identification confidence on the Bruker timsTOF Pro
Daryl Wilding‐McBride, Laura F. Dagley, … Andrew Ian Webb·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 7, 2022