bioRxivBiophysics
Accounting for Apparent Deviations between Calorimetric and van’t Hoff Enthalpies
Abstract
BackgroundIn theory, binding enthalpies directly obtained from calorimetry (such as ITC) and the temperature dependence of the binding free energy (vant Hoff method) should agree. However, previous studies have often found them to be discrepant.\n\nMethodsExperimental binding enthalpies (both calorimetric and vant Hoff) are obtained for two host-guest pairs using ITC, and the discrepancy between the two enthalpies is examined. Modeling of artificial ITC data is also used to examine how different sources of error propagate to both types of binding enthalpies.\n\nResultsFor the host-guest pairs examined here, good agreement, to within about 0.4 kcal/mol, is obtained between the two enthalpies. Additionally, using artificial data, we find that different sources of error propagate to either enthalpy uniquely, with concentration error and heat error propagating primarily to calorimetric and vant Hoff enthalpies, respectively.\n\nConclusionsWith modern calorimeters, good agreement between vant Hoff and calorimetric enthalpies should be achievable, barring issues due to non-ideality or unanticipated measurement pathologies. Indeed, disagreement between the two can serve as a flag for error-prone datasets. A review of the underlying theory supports the expectation that these two quantities should be in agreement.\n\nGeneral SignificanceWe address and arguably resolve long-standing questions regarding the relationship between calorimetric and vant Hoff enthalpies. In addition, we show that comparison of these two quantities can be used as an internal consistency check of a calorimetry study.\n\nHighlightsO_LIAgreement within ~0.4 kcal/mol between calorimetric and vant Hoff enthalpies can be achieved for systems with typical heat and concentration errors, if solution non-ideality is not an issue.\nC_LIO_LIConcentration error chiefly affects calorimetric enthalpies, while error in measured heat chiefly affects vant Hoff enthalpies.\nC_LIO_LILarge discrepancies between calorimetric and vant Hoff enthalpies can be used to flag experimental error.\nC_LIO_LIThere is no theoretical basis to expect discrepancies between these two methods of determining the binding enthalpy.\nC_LI
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Bayesian analysis of isothermal titration calorimetry for binding thermodynamics
T. H. Nguyen, A. S. Rustenburg, … D. D. L. Minh·bioRxiv·May 21, 2018
- Enthalpy-Entropy Compensation
Philippe Dumas·bioRxiv·Jun 10, 2025
- Binding Thermodynamics and Kinetics Calculations Using Chemical Host and Guest: A Comprehensive Picture of Molecular Recognition
Z. Tang, C.-e. Chang·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2017
- Avoiding accuracy-limiting pitfalls in the study of protein-ligand interactions with isothermal titration calorimetry
Sarah E. Boyce, Joel Tellinghuisen, John D. Chodera·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2015
- Activation parameters, enthalpy-entropy compensation and the temperature-dependent activity of enzymes
Matthew J. McLeod, Robert Edward Thorne·Protein SciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 24, 2026
- Binding Entropy Can Be Predicted by Crystallographic Ensembles
Charlotte A. Miller, Stephanie A. M. Wankowicz·bioRxiv·Jan 20, 2026