bioRxivAnimal Behavior & CognitionPreprint
Honeybees adjust colour preferences in response to concurrent social information from conspecifics and heterospecifics
Abstract
Bees efficiently learn asocial and social cues to optimise foraging from fluctuating floral resources. However, it remains unclear how bees respond to divergent sources of social information, and whether such social cues might modify bees’ natural preferences for non-social cues (e.g. flower colour), hence affecting foraging decisions. Here, we investigated honeybees’ (Apis mellifera) inspection and choices of unfamiliar flowers based on both natural colour preferences and simultaneous foraging information from conspecifics and heterospecifics. Individual honeybees’ preferences for flowers were recorded when the reward levels of a learned flower type had declined and novel-coloured flowers were available where they would find either no social information or one conspecific and one heterospecific (Bombus terrestris), each foraging from a different coloured flower (magenta or yellow). Honeybees showed a natural preference for magenta flowers. Honeybees modified their inspection of both types of flowers in response to conspecific and heterospecific social information. The presence of either demonstrator on the less-preferred yellow flower increased honeybees’ inspection of yellow flowers. Conspecific social information influenced observers’ foraging choices of yellow flowers, thus outweighing their original preference for magenta flowers. This effect was not elicited by heterospecific social information. Our results indicate that flower colour preferences of honeybees are rapidly adjusted in response to conspecific social information, which in turn is preferred over heterospecific information, possibly favouring the transmission of adaptive foraging information within species.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.View Full Text
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- organism: rat
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Social information use across trophic guilds: foraging bumble bees learn from lady beetles
Marie L. Muñiz, B. Meadows, … Elinor M. Lichtenberg·Behavioral EcologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 24, 2026
- Floral Cues and Flower Handling Tactics Affect Switching Decisions by Nectar-Foraging Bumble Bees
Minjung Baek, Jonathan S. Garcia, Daniel R. Papaj·Animal BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Aug 3, 2024
- Colour preference and constancy in the giant Asian honey bee Apis dorsata
R Sudeep, Sachin Bhaskar, Hema Somanathan·bioRxiv·Jan 21, 2026
- When should bees be flower constant? An agent-based model highlights the importance of social information and foraging conditions
L. Hayes, C. Grueter·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2022
- Foraging task specialization in honey bees (Apis mellifera): the contribution of floral rewards on the learning performance of pollen and nectar foragers
- Interindividual variability in flower pickiness by foraging bumblebees
Mélissa Armand, Christoph Beckenbauer, … Tomer J. Czaczkes·Behavioral Ecology and SociobiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 29, 2025