bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
Penetrance estimation of SORL1 loss-of-function variants using a family-based strategy adjusted on APOE genotypes suggest a non-monogenic inheritance
Catherine SchrammiD, Camille CharbonnieriD, Aline ZaréaiD, Morgane Lacour, David WalloniD, CNRMAJ collaborators, Anne BolandiD, Jean‐François DeleuzeiD, Robert OlasoiD, Flora AlarconiD, Dominique CampioniD, Grégory NueliD, Gaël NicolasiD
Abstract
For complex disorders, estimating the age-related penetrance associated with rare variants of strong effect is essential before a putative use for genetic counseling or disease prevention. However, rarity and co-occurrence with other risk factors make such estimations difficult. In the context of Alzheimer disease, we present a survival model to estimate the penetrance of SORL1 rare (allele frequency< 1%) Loss-of-Function variants (LoF) while accounting for APOE-{varepsilon}4, the main risk factor (allele frequency[~] 14% in Caucasians). We developed an efficient strategy to compute penetrance estimates accounting for both common and rare genetic variants based on available penetrance curves associated with common risk factors and using incomplete pedigree data to quantify the additional risk conferred by rare variants. Our model combines: (i) a baseline for non-carriers of SORL1 LoF variants, stratified by APOE genotypes derived from the Rotterdam study and (ii) an age-dependent proportional hazard effect for SORL1 LoF variants estimated from pedigrees with a proband carrying such a variant. We embed this model into an Expectation-Maximisation algorithm to accommodate for missing genotypes. Confidence intervals were computed by bootstraps. To correct for ascertainment bias, proband phenotypes were omitted. We obtained penetrance curves associated with SORL1 LoF variants at the digenic level. By age 70, we estimate a 100% penetrance of SORL1 LoF variants only among APOE-{varepsilon}4{varepsilon}4 carriers, while penetrance is 56%[40% - 72%] among {varepsilon}4 heterozygous carriers and 37%[26% - 51%] among {varepsilon}4 non-carriers. We conclude that rare SORL1 LoF variants should not be used for genetic counseling regardless of the APOE status.
- organism: human
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Domain mapping of disease mutations supports genetic testing of specific SORL1 variants in Alzheimer's Disease
Henne H. Holstege, Matthijs W. J. de Waal, … Jennifer S. Yokoyama·medRxiv·Jul 13, 2023
- A familial missense variant in the Alzheimer's Disease gene SORL1 impairs its maturation and endosomal sorting.
Elnaz Fazeli, Daniel D. Child, … Jessica E. Young·Acta NeuropathologicaPeer-reviewed·Jan 20, 2024
- Whole Exome Sequencing in 20,197 Persons for Rare Variants in Alzheimer Disease
Neha S. Raghavan, Adam M. Brickman, … Richard P Mayeux·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2018
- Missense and Loss of Function Variants at GWAS Loci in Familial Alzheimer's Disease
Tamil Iniyan Gunasekaran, Dolly Reyes‐Dumeyer, … Richard P Mayeux·Alzheimer s & DementiaPeer-reviewed·Sep 5, 2024
- Is SORL1 a common genetic target across neurodegenerative diseases?: A multi-ancestry biobank scale assessment
Marzieh Khani, Sheila Yeboah, … Sara Bandrés‐Ciga·medRxiv·Feb 2, 2026
- Relying on the relationship with known disease-causing variants in homologous proteins to predict pathogenicity of SORL1 variants in Alzheimer's disease
O. M. Andersen, G. Monti, … H. Holstege·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2023