Assessment of Potential Health and Genetic Impacts in Releasing Confiscated Paroaria coronata and Saltator similis
C. E. F. d. Cruz, G. R. Funkler, A. L. S. Zani, P. G. C. Wagner, L. N. Segura, I. Andretta, N. J. R. Fagundes
Abstract
Illegal capture and trade of wild birds has long been a threat to biodiversity. Translocation—the release of individuals from one location into another—is a useful conservation tool in the management of species. However, both health (such as different pathogens) and adaptive (such as local adaptation), differences among populations must be taken into account, as both can impact the recipient population negatively. Here, we provide health and genetic information to support release planning for two of the most trafficked Brazilian wild bird species (Paroaria coronata and Saltator similis). We focused on two fundamental questions: Are there significant differences in pathogen load between wild and captive populations? Is there significant genetic structure among populations? In total, 223 free-living birds were captured, sampled, and released at the same site. Devices and live decoys characteristics were top factors influencing captures. We tested blood, feces, and oropharyngeal swabs from free-ranging (n=101) and confiscated (n=92) birds for Newcastle disease virus, Salmonella spp., and Mycoplasma gallisepticum. Genetic structure among populations was investigated using mtDNA in a subsample of these birds. We found no evidence for Newcastle disease virus and Salmonella spp. in seized and free-living birds from both species. However, seized P. coronata and S. similis may be potential sources of M. gallisepticum. We found significant but low genetic structure among populations occurring in different Biomes (ΦCT=0.26 for P. coronata; ΦCT=0.13 for S. similis) and no significant structure among populations occurring in the Pampa Biome. These results suggest that while it may be important to screen seized birds for avian pathogens, genetic structure among populations seems to be of lesser concern when planning the release of seized songbirds in the wild.View Full Text
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Ban on wild bird importation accelerated the spread of global viral outbreaks in parrots.
R. Komorizono, N. Aihara, … A. Makino·bioRxiv·May 31, 2022
- HOW MANY GAMEBIRDS ARE RELEASED IN THE UK EACH YEAR?
J. R. Madden·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2020
- Translocations spur population growth but exacerbate inbreeding in an imperiled species
T. Linderoth, L. Deaner, … S. W. Fitzpatrick·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2023
- Meta-transcriptomic analysis of virus diversity in urban wild birds with paretic disease
W.-S. Chang, J.-S. Eden, … E. C. Holmes·Journal of VirologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 31, 2020
- Wild birds' plight and role in the current bird flu panzootic
M. Klaassen, M. Wille·bioRxiv·May 2, 2023
- Never judge a bird by its feathers: genetics unveils the true target of trafficking in morphologically similar Copsychus species
Emily Louisa Cavill, Germán Hernández‐Alonso, … Marcus Thomas P. Gilbert·bioRxiv·Apr 14, 2023