Specific amygdala and hippocampal subfield volumes in social anxiety disorder and their relation to clinical characteristics; an international mega-analysis
Ziphozihle NtwatwaiD, Jule M. Spreckelmeyer, Janna Marie Bas‐HoogendamiD, Jack van HonkiD, Mary Sophia MuffordiD, Carl‐Johan BoraxbekkiD, Jean‐Paul FouchéiD, Andreas FrickiD, Tomas FurmarkiD, Heide KlumppiD, Christine LöchneriD, K. Luan PhaniD, Kristoffer N. T. MånssoniD, Justine Nienke PannekoekiD, Jutta PeterbursiD, Karin Roelofs AiD, Annerine RoosiD, Thomas StraubeiD, Henk van SteenbergeniD, Marie‐José van ToliD, Dick J. VeltmaniD, Nic J. A. van der WeeiD, Dan Joseph SteiniD, Jonathan IpseriD, Nynke A. GroenewoldiD
Abstract
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) has been associated with alterations in amygdala and hippocampal volume but there is mixed evidence for the direction of volumetric alterations. Additionally, little is known about the involvement of the distinct subfields in the pathophysiology of SAD. Volumetric data from a large multi-centre sample of 107 adult individuals with SAD and 140 healthy controls (HCs) was segmented using FreeSurfer to produce 9 amygdala and 12 hippocampal subfield volumes. Volumes were compared between groups using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for age, age-squared, sex, site and whole amygdala and hippocampal volumes. Subgroup analyses examined subfield volumes in relation to comorbid anxiety disorder, and comorbid major depressive disorder (MDD), psychotropic medication status, and symptom severity. In the full sample, SAD was associated with smaller amygdala volumes in the basal (d=-0.32, pFDR=0.022), accessory basal (d=- 0.42, pFDR=0.005) and corticoamygdaloid transition area (d=-0.37, pFDR=0.014), and larger hippocampal volume in the CA3 (d=0.34, pFDR=0.024), CA4 (d=0.44, pFDR=0.007), dentate gyrus (d=0.35, pFDR=0.022) and molecular layer (d=0.28, pFDR= 0.033), compared to HCs. SAD without comorbid anxiety, in addition, demonstrated smaller lateral amygdala (d=-0.30, pFDR=0.037) and hippocampal amygdala transition area (d=-0.33, pFDR=0.027) relative to HCs. In SAD without comorbid MDD, only the smaller accessory basal amygdala remained significant (d=-0.41, pFDR=0.017). No association was found between subfield volume and medication status or symptom severity. In conclusion, we observed distinct patterns of volumetric differences across specific amygdala and hippocampal subfields, regions that are associated with sensory information processing, threat evaluation and fear generalization. These findings suggest a possible disruption in information flow between the amygdala and hippocampal formation for fear processing in SAD.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Hippocampal and amygdala subfield volumes in obsessive-compulsive disorder differ according to medication status.
Ziphozihle Ntwatwa, Christine Löchner, … Jonathan Ipser·bioRxiv·Mar 28, 2023
- Social anxiety links of amygdala switch cross puberty
Quan Zhou, Zi-Xuan Zhou, … Xi‐Nian Zuo·bioRxiv·May 1, 2024
- A Brain Model of Altered Self-Appraisal in Social Anxiety Disorder
Alec J. Jamieson, Ben J. Harrison, … Christopher G. Davey·Translational PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Nov 11, 2023
- Unmasking Anxiety in Autism: Explicit and Implicit Threatening Face Stimuli Dissociate Amygdala-centered Functional Connectivity
Yu‐Chun Chen, Chenyi Chen, … Yawei Cheng·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2020
- Smaller Hippocampal CA-1 Subfield Volume in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Lyon W. Chen, Delin Sun, … Rajendra A. Morey·Depression and AnxietyPeer-reviewed·Sep 26, 2018
- Neurocognitive Heterogeneity in Social Anxiety Disorder: The Role of Self-Referential Processing and Childhood Maltreatment
Anat Talmon, Matthew L. Dixon, … James J. Gross·Clinical Psychological SciencePeer-reviewed·May 6, 2021