Breaking the sparsity barrier in clinical targeted-panel sequencing: Mapping the inherited determinants of mutational signatures
Alon RavidiD, Hagay LadanyiD, Alexander GuseviD, Yosef E. MaruvkaiD
Abstract
Cancer development is shaped by somatic mutational processes that leave characteristic patterns known as mutational signatures. The inherited determinants of variability in signature activity remain largely unknown. Common germline variants that regulate this activity, which we term Signature Quantitative Trait Loci (SigQTLs), are expected to have modest individual effects, requiring cohorts of tens of thousands of samples for reliable detection. Clinical targeted-panel sequencing datasets achieve this scale, but present a fundamental challenge: individual tumors typically harbor too few mutations for stable signature inference. To overcome this sparsity barrier, we introduce GroupSig, a framework that aggregates sparse mutational patterns across samples sharing a germline genotype into information-rich meta-samples, enabling robust signature inference at the population level. We validated GroupSig by recovering the well-established correlations between age and clock-like signatures SBS1 and SBS5 using emulated panel data from The-Cancer-Genome-Atlas. We then applied GroupSig to approximately 32,000 tumor samples from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute PROFILE cohort in a genome-wide SigQTL scan. We identified 9 genome-wide significant SigQTLs, with the strongest signal at locus 16q24.3, where six variants were associated with increased SBS7 (UV exposure) activity. This association persisted after excluding melanoma samples, arguing against a tumor-type enrichment artifact. Validation in TCGA confirmed 6 SigQTLs, all at 16q24.3, where implicated variants are eQTLs for CDK10 and SPG7 in skin tissue. Beyond genome-wide hits, DNA repair genes were 12.6-fold enriched among sub-threshold signals, supporting a polygenic architecture for mutational process regulation. GroupSig provides a scalable framework for germline-somatic association studies using panel sequencing data.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A real-world pan-cancer catalogue of mutational signatures from 111,711 tumors
Donghyuk Lee, Min Hua, … Bin Zhu·medRxiv·May 18, 2023
- De Novo Mutational Signature Discovery in Tumor Genomes using SparseSignatures
Avantika Lal, Keli Liu, … Daniele Ramazzotti·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 28, 2021
- Assigning mutational signatures to individual samples and individual somatic mutations with SigProfilerAssignment
Marcos Díaz‐Gay, Raviteja Vangara, … Ludmil B. Alexandrov·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2023
- CANCERSIGN: a user-friendly and robust tool for identification and classification of mutational signatures and patterns in cancer genomes
Masroor Bayati, Hamid Reza Rabiee, … Hamid Alinejad‐Rokny·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2020
- Correlation-aware discovery of co-occurring mutational signatures in cancer
Hu Jin, Benedikt Geiger, … Peter J. Park·bioRxiv·Sep 21, 2026
- TrackSig: reconstructing evolutionary trajectories of mutations in cancer
Yulia Rubanova, Ruian Shi, … PCAWG network·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2019