Correlated responses to experimental evolution of increased post-infection survival in Drosophila melanogaster: Life-history trade-offs and reaction to novel stressors

Evolution of increased immune defence is often limited by costs: correlated changes in other traits (viz. life-history traits) that otherwise reduce the fitness of the host organisms. Experimental evolution studies are useful for understanding the evolution of immune function, and correlated changes in other traits. We experimentally evolved replicate Drosophila melanogaster populations to better survive infection challenge with an entomopathogenic bacteria, Enterococcus faecalis. Within 35 generations of forward selection, selected populations showed marked increase in post-infection survival compared to ancestrally paired controls. We next measured various life-history traits of these populations. Our results show that the selected populations do not differ from control populations for larval development time and body weight at eclosion. No difference is also observed in case of fecundity and longevity (following the acute phase of infection), either when the flies are subjected to infection or when the flies were uninfected; although infected flies from all populations die much earlier compared to uninfected flies. Selected flies and control flies are also equally good at surviving abiotic stressors (starvation and desiccation), although infected flies from all populations are more susceptible to stress than uninfected flies. Therefore, we conclude that (a) D. melanogaster populations can rapidly evolve to be more immune to infection with E. faecalis; (b) evolution of increased defence against E. faecalis entails no life-history cost for the hosts; and (c) evolving defence against a biotic threat (pathogen) does not make flies more resistant to abiotic stressors.