Adjusting ADJUST: Optimizing the ADJUST Algorithm for Pediatric Data Using Geodesic Nets
Stephanie C. LeachiD, Santiago MoralesiD, Maureen E. BowersiD, George Arthur BuzzelliD, Ranjan DebnathiD, Daniel Beall, Nathan A. FoxiD
Abstract
A major challenge for electroencephalograph (EEG) studies on pediatric populations is that large amounts of data are lost due to artifacts (e.g., movement and blinks). Independent component analysis (ICA) can separate artifactual and neural activity, allowing researchers to remove such artifactual activity and retain a greater percentage of EEG data for analyses. However, manual identification of artifactual components is time consuming and requires subjective judgment. Automated algorithms, like ADJUST and ICLabel, have been validated on adults using the international 10-20 system, but to our knowledge no such algorithms have been optimized for the geodesic sensor net, which is often used with infants and children. Therefore, in an attempt to automate artifact selection for pediatric data collected with geodesic nets, we modified ADJUSTs algorithm. Our \"adjusted-ADJUST\" algorithm was compared to the \"original-ADJUST\" algorithm and ICLabel in adults, children, and infants on three different performance measures: respective classification agreement with expert coders, the number of trials retained following artifact removal, and the reliability of the EEG signal after pre-processing with each algorithm. Overall, the adjusted-ADJUST algorithm performed better than the original-ADJUST algorithm and no ICA correction with adult and pediatric data. Moreover, it performed better than ICLabel for pediatric data. These results indicate that optimizing existing algorithms for data collected with a geodesic net improves artifact classification and retains more trials, potentially facilitating EEG studies with pediatric populations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 103
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Automatic classification of ICA components from infant EEG using MARA
Ira Marriott Haresign, Emily Phillips, … Sam V. Wass·Developmental Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 22, 2021
- Eye-movement artifact correction in infant EEG
Diksha Srishyla, Sara Jane Webb, … Christian O’Reilly·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2024
- Automated Pipeline for Infants Continuous EEG (APICE): a flexible pipeline for developmental studies
Ana Fló, Giulia Gennari, … Ghislaine Dehaene‐Lambertz·Developmental Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2022
- APICE-Py: An Open-Source MNE-Python Pipeline for Scalable EEG Preprocessing
Nicolo Formento Moletta, Ana Fló, … Jhunlyn Lorenzo·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2026
- RELAX-Jr: An Automated Pre-Processing Pipeline for Developmental EEG Recordings
Aron T. Hill, Peter G. Enticott, … Neil Wayne Bailey·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2024
- Automated detection of artefacts in neonatal EEG with residual neural networks
Lachlan Webb, Minna Kauppila, … Nathan J. Stevenson·Computer Methods and Programs in BiomedicinePeer-reviewed·May 24, 2021