Effects of diversifying the planting period of maize on herbivorous and their natural enemies
Abstract
Knowledge of the specific insect densities during crop development is necessary to perform appropriate measures for the control of insect pests and to minimize yield losses. In a previous study, both spatial and temporal approaches were adopted to analyse the influence of landscape structure and field variables on herbivore and predatory insects on maize. Both types of variables influenced insect abundance, but the highest effect was found with maize phenology. Given that the field planting date could modulate the influence produced by the structure of the landscape on herbivores and predatory insects, analyses of population dynamics must be performed at both the local and landscape levels. The anterior prompted us to study these aspects in the two common planting periods (early and late) in northern Spain. The present study tests the hypothesis that the period of maize planting could have a higher effect than phenology or interannual variation on the abundance of natural enemies and herbivores on maize. Our results showed that only the abundances of other herbivore thrips and Syrphidae were significantly different between the two planting periods. Moreover, we found significant effects of planting period when we performed yearly analysis in 2015 for Coccinellidae and Chrysopidae and in 2016 and 2017 for Aeolothrips sp. Most of the taxa had abundance peaks in earlier growth stages, which are related to pollination (before or during), while only Stethorus punctillum and Syrphidae increased later in the season. Furthermore, Frankliniella occidentalis, aphids, Syrphidae and Coccinellidae registered higher abundances in fields sown in the late planting period than in the rest of the insect species. The results of the present study highlight the effects of sowing dates on insect dynamics in maize. HighlightsO_LIHerbivorous and natural enemy abundance peaks in earlier growth stages. C_LIO_LIAbundance of thrip and Syrphidae were different between the two planting periods. C_LIO_LIAbundance of Coccinellidae, Chrysopidae and Aeolothrips sp. was different when performed yearly analysis. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Effects of maize development and phenology on the field infestation dynamics of the European Corn Borer
Sacha Revillon, Christine Dillmann, … Judith Legrand·Journal of Economic EntomologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2024
- Species composition and dynamics of aphids and parasitoid wasps in maize fields in Northeastern China
- Maize Biochemical Defences against a Rootworm Were Mediated by Domestication, Spread, and Breeding
A. A. Fontes-Puebla, E. J. Borrego, … J. S. Bernal·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2020
- Genotype, nitrogen and herbivory shape plant defense: the case of a vitamin-enriched maize
Agnès Ardanuy, Victoria Pastor, … Ramon Albajes·bioRxiv·Jul 6, 2017
- How does selection for flowering in maize shapes defenses components against the European Corn Borer ?
Sacha Revillon, Inoussa Sanané, … Judith Legrand·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2025
- Who, what, when, where: Phenological trends of the Seedcorn Maggot Complex (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in three vegetable crops in Southern Quebec
Allen Bush‐Beaupré, Anne‐Marie Fortier, Jade Savage·bioRxiv·May 26, 2026