Sign in
BioengineeringbioRxiv

Optimizing the Electric Field Strength in Multiple Targets for Multichannel Transcranial Electric Stimulation

G. Bicalho Saturnino, K. H. Madsen, A. Thielscher

Abstract

ObjectiveMost approaches to optimize the electric field pattern generated by multichannel Transcranial Electric Stimulation (TES) require the definition of a preferred direction of the electric field in the target region(s). However, this requires knowledge about how the neural effects depend on the field direction, which is not always available. Thus, it can be preferential to optimize the field strength in the target(s), irrespective of the field direction. However, this results in a more complex optimization problem. ApproachWe introduce and validate a novel optimization algorithm that maximizes focality while controlling the electric field strength in the target to maintain a defined value. It obeys the safety constraints, allows limiting the number of active electrodes and allows also for multi-target optimization. Main ResultsThe optimization algorithm outperformed naive search approaches in both quality of the solution and computational efficiency. Using the amygdala as test case, we show that it allows for reaching a reasonable trade-off between focality and field strength in the target. In contrast, simply maximizing the field strength in the target results in far more extended fields. In addition, by maintaining the pre-defined field strengths in the targets, the new algorithm allows for a balanced stimulation of two or more regions. SignificanceThe novel algorithm can be used to automatically obtain individualized, optimal montages for targeting regions without the need to define preferential directions. It will automatically select the field direction that achieves the desired field strength in the target(s) with the most focal stimulation pattern.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISRadecke '20Weise '25Corazza '19Huang '18Dmochowski '17Numssen '26
83% semantic matchNeuroscience
Jan‐Ole Radecke, Asad Khan, Andreas Karl Engel+2 more·IEEE Access·Jan 1, 2020· 15 citations