eLifeBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Evidence of off-target probe binding affecting 10x Genomics Xenium gene panels compromise accuracy of spatial transcriptomic profiling
Caleb HallinaniD, Hyun Joo JiiD, Edmund TsouiD, Steven L. SalzbergiD, Jean FaniD
Abstract
The accuracy of spatial gene expression profiles generated by probe-based in situ spatially-resolved transcriptomic technologies depends on the specificity with which probes bind to their intended target gene. Off-target binding, defined as a probe binding to something other than the target gene, can distort a genes true expression profile, making probe specificity essential for reliable transcriptomics. Here, we investigated off-target binding affecting the 10x Genomics Xenium technology. We developed a software tool, Off-target Probe Tracker (OPT), to identify putative off-target binding via alignment of probe sequences and assessing whether mapped loci corresponded to the intended target gene across multiple reference annotations. Applying OPT to a Xenium human breast gene panel, we identified at least 14 out of the 313 genes in the panel potentially impacted by off-target binding to protein-coding genes. To substantiate our predictions, we leveraged a Xenium breast cancer dataset generated using this gene panel and compared results to orthogonal spatial and single-cell transcriptomic profiles from Visium CytAssist and 3' single-cell RNA-seq derived from the same tumor block. Our findings indicate that for some genes, the expression patterns detected by Xenium demonstrably reflect the aggregate expression of the target and predicted off-target genes based on Visium and single-cell RNA-seq rather than the target gene alone. We further applied OPT to identify potential off-target binding in custom gene panels and integrate tissue-specific RNA-seq data to assess effects. Overall, this work enhances the biological interpretability of spatial transcriptomics data and improves reproducibility in spatial transcriptomics research.
- organism: human
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 4
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- From Transcripts to Cells: Dissecting Sensitivity, Signal Contamination, and Specificity in Xenium Spatial Transcriptomics
Mariia Bilous, Daria Buszta, … Raphaël Gottardo·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Apr 30, 2026
- X-SPEAR: An Extensible Framework for Spatial Panel Evaluation and Refinement
Rushil Patel, Bryant Duong, … Yuyan Cheng·bioRxiv·Oct 20, 2026
- An experimental comparison of the Digital Spatial Profiling and Visium spatial transcriptomics technologies for cancer research
T. Wang, K. Harvey, … A. Swarbrick·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2023
- Spurious off-target signals from potential lncRNAs by 10X Visium probes
P. Prakrithi, Juwayria, … Ishaan Gupta·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2022
- Optimizing Xenium In Situ data utility by quality assessment and best practice analysis workflows
Sergio Marco Salas, Louis Benedikt Kuemmerle, … Mats F. Nilsson·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Mar 13, 2025
- Fishing with Two Lines: A Hybrid Approach to Spatial Transcriptomic Discovery
Arianna L. Williams-Katek, Saahithi Mallapragada, … Nicholas E. Banovich·Life Science AlliancePeer-reviewed·Jul 16, 2026