Nature MethodsCancer BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
From Transcripts to Cells: Dissecting Sensitivity, Signal Contamination, and Specificity in Xenium Spatial Transcriptomics
Mariia BilousiD, Daria BusztaiD, Jonathan BaciD, Senbai KangiD, Yixing DongiD, Stephanie Tissot, Sylvie André, Marina Alexandre Gaveta, Christel VoizeiD, Solange PetersiD, Krisztián HomicskóiD, Raphaël GottardoiD
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics has transformed our ability to map gene expression within intact tissues at cellular and subcellular resolution. Among current platforms, Xenium is widely adopted for its reliability, accessibility, and high data quality. Yet, the properties and limitations of Xenium-derived data remain poorly characterized. Here, we present one of the most comprehensive Xenium datasets to date, encompassing over 40 breast and lung tumor sections profiled using a diverse set of gene panels. Leveraging this resource, we systematically dissect technical noise--including transcript diffusion--alongside assay specificity, panel performance, and segmentation strategies. Our comparison of targeted panels with the newer 5K panel reveals that although the latter captures more transcripts overall, it suffers from reduced per-gene sensitivity and persistent diffusion, even with enhanced chemistry. We demonstrate that single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) markedly improves cell type annotation and enables more precise quantification of diffusion. Building on this, we introduce SPLIT (Spatial Purification of Layered Intracellular Transcripts), a novel method that integrates snRNA-seq with RCTD deconvolution to enhance signal purity. SPLIT effectively resolves mixed transcriptomic signals, improving background correction and cell-type resolution. Together, our findings provide a critical benchmark for Xenium performance and introduce a scalable strategy for signal refinement--advancing the accuracy and utility of spatial transcriptomics.
- organism: mouse
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 30.78
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Optimizing Xenium In Situ data utility by quality assessment and best practice analysis workflows
Sergio Marco Salas, Louis Benedikt Kuemmerle, … Mats F. Nilsson·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Mar 13, 2025
- A Comparative Analysis of Imaging-Based Spatial Transcriptomics Platforms
David P. Cook, Kirk B. Jensen, … Luciano Gastón Martelotto·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2023
- Evidence of off-target probe binding affecting 10x Genomics Xenium gene panels compromise accuracy of spatial transcriptomic profiling
Caleb Hallinan, Hyun Joo Ji, … Jean Fan·eLifePeer-reviewed·May 1, 2026
- Next generation statistical framework for next generation spatial transcriptomics data
Fatoumata Mangane, Pierre Bost·BMC MethodsPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2026
- nf_xpatial: A Reproducible Framework for Standardized Preprocessing and Clustering of Xenium Data
Luke Potter, Austyn Trull, … Lara Ianov·bioRxiv·Aug 29, 2026
- Systematic Benchmarking of High-Throughput Subcellular Spatial Transcriptomics Platforms
Pengfei Ren, Rui Zhang, … Zexian Zeng·bioRxiv·Dec 23, 2024