bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
X-SPEAR: An Extensible Framework for Spatial Panel Evaluation and Refinement
Rushil PateliD, Bryant Duong, Veer Patel, Rachel Lyn-Sue, Kyungbin Oh, Yuyan ChengiD
Abstract
Targeted spatial transcriptomics platforms such as Xenium require a predefined gene panel, and the genes in that panel are detected less efficiently, and to gene-specific degrees, in the spatial assay than in the single-cell reference used to choose them. We present X-SPEAR, a framework that couples DART marker selection with probe-level off-target assessment. DART learns short, interpretable Boolean gene rules and assembles several gene-disjoint rules per cell type. Its detection-aware training thins the reference to per-gene detection rates measured in a different, already completed experiment, so no Xenium data from the target tissue are needed before the panel is ordered. On held-out Xenium data from ovarian cancer, mouse brain and cervical cancer, DART substantially outperformed existing marker-selection methods at matched panel size, by 0.04-0.11 macro-F1 over Wilcoxon rank-sum, 0.04-0.08 over COSG and 0.10-0.18 over NS-Forest, and it reached Wilcoxon's best accuracy with 42-69% fewer genes. Ablations show that most of this gain comes from detection-aware training, which also improves other rank-based selectors and requires a detection profile measured with the same assay chemistry. At similar accuracy, DART's rule structure adds rules that faithfully summarise the downstream classifier, robustness to single-probe loss across 45 retinal ganglion cell subtypes, and better resolution of closely related cell states. We are applying X-SPEAR to design a Xenium panel for mouse retinal ganglion cell subtypes, and its in situ evaluation is in progress. X-SPEAR is available as an open-source Python package.
- organism: mouse
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evidence of off-target probe binding affecting 10x Genomics Xenium gene panels compromise accuracy of spatial transcriptomic profiling
Caleb Hallinan, Hyun Joo Ji, … Jean Fan·eLifePeer-reviewed·May 1, 2026
- Lack of adoption of computational gene-panel-selection tools in targeted spatial transcriptomics
Ceyhun Alar, Lorenzo Venturelli, … Alejandro Sifrim·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2026
- From Transcripts to Cells: Dissecting Sensitivity, Signal Contamination, and Specificity in Xenium Spatial Transcriptomics
Mariia Bilous, Daria Buszta, … Raphaël Gottardo·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Apr 30, 2026
- Gene panel selection for targeted spatial transcriptomics
Yida Zhang, Viktor Petukhov, … Peter V. Kharchenko·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2024
- Predictive and robust gene selection for spatial transcriptomics
- Optimal Gene Panel Selection for Targeted Spatial Transcriptomics Experiments
Haoran Lu, Luyang Fang, … Ping Ma·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 6, 2026