The discovery, distribution and diversity of DNA viruses associated with Drosophila melanogaster in Europe
M. A. Wallace, K. A. Coffman, C. Gilbert, S. Ravindran, G. F. Albery, J. Abbott, E. Argyridou, P. Bellosta, A. J. Betancourt, H. Colinet, K. Eric, A. Glaser-Schmitt, S. Grath, M. Jelic, M. Kankare, I. Kozeretska, V. Loeschcke, C. Montchamp-Moreau, L. Ometto, B. S. Onder, D. J. Orengo, J. Parsch, M. Pascual, A. Patenkovic, E. Puerma, , D. J. Obbard
Abstract
Drosophila melanogaster is an important model for antiviral immunity in arthropods, but very few DNA viruses have been described from the family Drosophilidae. This deficiency limits our opportunity to use natural host-pathogen combinations in experimental studies, and may bias our understanding of the Drosophila virome. Here we report fourteen DNA viruses detected in a metagenomic analysis of approximately 6500 pool-sequenced Drosophila, sampled from 47 European locations between 2014 and 2016. These include three new Nudiviruses, a new and divergent Entomopox virus, a virus related to Leptopilina boulardi filamentous virus, and a virus related to Musca domestica salivary gland hypertrophy virus. We also find an endogenous genomic copy of Galbut virus, a dsRNA Partitivirus, segregating at very low frequency. Remarkably, we find that Drosophila Vesanto virus, a small DNA virus previously described as a Bidnavirus, may be composed of up to 12 segments and represent a new lineage of segmented DNA viruses. Two of the DNA viruses, Drosophila Kallithea nudivirus and Drosophila Vesanto virus are relatively common, found in 2% or more of wild flies. The others are rare, with many likely to be represented by a single infected fly. We find that virus prevalence in Europe reflects the prevalence seen in publicly-available datasets, with Drosophila Kallithea nudivirus and Drosophila Vesanto virus the only ones commonly detectable in public data from wild-caught flies and large population cages, and the other viruses being rare or absent. These analyses suggest that DNA viruses are at lower prevalence than RNA viruses in D. melanogaster, and may be less likely to persist in laboratory cultures. Our findings go some way to redressing an earlier bias toward RNA virus studies in Drosophila, and lay the foundation needed to harness the power of Drosophila as a model system for the study of DNA viruses.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Twenty five new viruses associated with the Drosophilidae (Diptera)
Claire L Webster, Ben Longdon, … Darren J Obbard·bioRxiv·Apr 24, 2016
- The discovery, distribution and evolution of viruses associated with Drosophila melanogaster
Claire L Webster, Fergal M Waldron, … Darren J Obbard·PLOS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 14, 2015
- Isolation of a natural DNA virus of Drosophila melanogaster, and characterisation of host resistance and immune responses
W. H. Palmer, N. Medd, … D. J. Obbard·bioRxiv·Mar 27, 2018
- A diverse gut virome from Drosophila melanogaster
M. H. Ansari, Fabian Staubach, … Darren J. Obbard·Animal MicrobiomePeer-reviewed·Jun 4, 2026
- Hunting Drosophila viruses from wild populations: a novel isolation approach and characterisation of viruses
G. Bruner-Montero, C. Luque, … F. M. Jiggins·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2022
- Naturally occurring viruses of Drosophila reduce offspring number and lifespan
M. A. Wallace, D. J. Obbard·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2023