Sign in
Animal Behavior & CognitionbioRxiv

Remembrance of Inferences Past

Ishita Dasgupta, E. Schulz, N. D. Goodman, S. J. Gershman

Abstract

Bayesian models of cognition assume that people compute probability distributions over hypotheses. However, the required computations are frequently intractable or prohibitively expensive. Since people often encounter many closely related distributions, selective reuse of computations (amortized inference) is a computationally efficient use of the brains limited resources. We present three experiments that provide evidence for amortization in human probabilistic reasoning. When sequentially answering two related queries about natural scenes, participants responses to the second query systematically depend on the structure of the first query. This influence is sensitive to the content of the queries, only appearing when the queries are related. Using a cognitive load manipulation, we find evidence that people amortize summary statistics of previous inferences, rather than storing the entire distribution. These findings support the view that the brain trades off accuracy and computational cost, to make efficient use of its limited cognitive resources to approximate probabilistic inference.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISDasgupta '17Dasgupta '19Lin '24Zénon '26Ota '23Bornstein '17
92% semantic matchAnimal Behavior & Cognition
Ishita Dasgupta, Eric Schulz, Noah D. Goodman+1 more·bioRxiv·May 12, 2017