ATHENA: Automatically Tracking Hands Expertly with No Annotations
Daanish M. Mulla, Mario Costantino, Erez FreudiD, Jonathan A. MichaelsiD
Abstract
Studying naturalistic hand behaviours is challenging due to the limitations of conventional marker-based motion capture, which can be costly, time-consuming, and encumber participants. While markerless pose estimation exists - an accurate, off-the-shelf solution validated for hand-object manipulation is needed. We present ATHENA (Automatically Tracking Hands Expertly with No Annotations), an open-source, Python-based toolbox for 3D markerless hand tracking. To validate ATHENA, we concurrently recorded hand kinematics using ATHENA and an industry-standard optoelectronic marker-based system (OptiTrack). Participants performed unimanual, bimanual, and naturalistic object manipulation and we compared common kinematic variables like grip aperture, wrist velocity, index metacarpophalangeal flexion, and bimanual span. Our results demonstrated high spatiotemporal agreement between ATHENA and OptiTrack. This was evidenced by extremely high matches (R2 > 0.90 across the majority of tasks) and low root mean square differences (< 1 cm for grip aperture, < 4 cm/s for wrist velocity, and < 5-10{degrees} for index metacarpophalangeal flexion). ATHENA reliably preserved trial-to-trial variability in kinematics, offering identical scientific conclusions to marker-based approaches, but with significantly reduced financial and time costs and no participant encumbrance. In conclusion, ATHENA is an accurate, automated, and easy-to-use platform for 3D markerless hand tracking that enables more ecologically valid motor control and learning studies of naturalistic hand behaviours, enhancing our understanding of human dexterity.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Field percentile
- top 31%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluation of 3D markerless motion capture accuracy using OpenPose with multiple video cameras
Nobuyasu Nakano, 哲郎 櫻, … Shinsuke Yoshioka·Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2020
- Quantifying similarities between MediaPipe and a known standard for tracking 2D hand trajectories
Vaidehi P. Wagh, Matthew W. Scott, Sarah N. Kraeutner·bioRxiv·Nov 21, 2023
- Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements
K. Song, T. J. Hullfish, … J. R. Baxter·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2023
- Validation of two-dimensional video-based inference of finger kinematics with pose estimation
L. Gionfrida, W. Rusli, … A. E. Kedgley·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2022
- Marker Data Enhancement For Markerless Motion Capture
Antoine Motte dit Falisse, Scott D. Uhlrich, … Scott L. Delp·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2025
- The Development and Evaluation of a Fully Automated Markerless Motion Capture Workflow
L. Needham, M. Evans, … S. L. Colyer·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2022