Sign in
BioinformaticsScientific Reports
Peer-reviewed journal article

PinAPL-Py: A comprehensive web-application for the analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 screens

Philipp N. SpahniD, Tyler BathiD, Ryan J. WeissiD, Jihoon KimiD, Jeffrey D. EskoiD, Nathan E. LewisiD, Olivier HarismendyiD

Abstract

BackgroundLarge-scale genetic screens using CRISPR/Cas9 technology have emerged as a major tool for functional genomics. With its increased popularity, experimental biologists frequently acquire large sequencing datasets for which they often do not have an easy analysis option. While a few bioinformatic tools have been developed for this purpose, their utility is still hindered either due to limited functionality or the requirement of bioinformatic expertise.\n\nResultsTo make sequencing data analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 screens more accessible to a wide range of scientists, we developed a Platform-independent Analysis of Pooled Screens using Python (PinAPL-Py), which is operated as an intuitive web-service. PinAPL-Py implements state-of-the-art tools and statistical models, assembled in a comprehensive workflow covering sequence quality control, automated sgRNA sequence extraction, alignment, sgRNA enrichment/depletion analysis and gene ranking. The workflow is set up to use a variety of popular sgRNA libraries as well as custom libraries that can be easily uploaded. Various analysis options are offered, suitable to analyze a large variety of CRISPR/Cas9 screening experiments. Analysis output includes ranked lists of sgRNAs and genes, and publication-ready plots.\n\nConclusionsPinAPL-Py helps to advance genome-wide screening efforts by combining comprehensive functionality with user-friendly implementation. PinAPL-Py is freely accessible at http://pinapl-py.ucsd.edu with instructions, documentation and test datasets. The source code is available at https://github.com/LewisLabUCSD/PinAPL-Py

PDFDOICode

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
99
FWCI
2.12
Field percentile
top 12%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWinter '17Vinceti '23Jeong '19Jeong '17Braunger '24Hart '16
79% semantic matchBioinformatics
Jan Winter, Marc Schwering, Oliver Pelz+4 more·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2017· 54 citations