Sign in
NeuroscienceCognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
Peer-reviewed journal article

Liking and left amygdala activity during food versus non-food processing are modulated by emotional context

Isabel García‐GarcíaiD, Jana KubeiD, Filip MorysiD, Anne Marie SchrimpfiD, Ahmad Seif KanaaniD, Michael GaebleriD, Arno VillringeriD, Alain DagheriD, Annette HorstmanniD, Jane NeumanniD

Abstract

Emotions can influence our eating behaviors. Facing an acute stressor or being in a positive mood are examples of situations that tend to modify appetite. However, the question of how the brain integrates these emotion-related changes in food processing remains elusive. Here we designed an emotional priming fMRI task to test if amygdala activity during food pictures differs depending on the emotional context. Fifty-eight female participants completed a novel emotional priming task, in which emotional images of negative, neutral or positive situations were followed by pictures of either foods or objects. After priming in each trial, participants rated how much they liked the shown foods or objects. We analyzed how brain activity during the contrast \"foods > objects\" changed according to the emotional context - in the whole brain and in the amygdala. We also examined the potential effect of adiposity (i.e., waist circumference). We observed a higher difference between liking scores for foods and objects after positive priming than after neutral priming. In the left amygdala, activity in the contrast \"foods > objects\" was higher after neutral priming relative to negative priming. Waist circumference was not significantly related to this emotional priming effect on food processing. Our results suggest that emotional context alters food and non-food perception, both in terms of liking scores and with regards to engagement of the left amygdala. Moreover, our findings indicate that emotional context has an impact on the salience advantage of food, possibly affecting eating behavior.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
20
FWCI
1.31
Field percentile
top 22%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISCalhoon '18Maier '20Moerel '26Mas '20Wegman '18Sambuco '26
72% semantic matchNeuroscience
Gwendolyn G. Calhoon, Amy K. Sutton, Chia-Jung Chang+11 more·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2018· 24 citations