henhaobio
Sign in

Brain stimulationNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Ramped V1 transcranial ultrasonic stimulation modulates but does not evoke visual evoked potentials

Tulika NandiiD, Ainslie JohnstoneiD, Eleanor M. MartiniD, Catharina ZichiD, Robert James CooperiD, Sven BestmanniD, Til Ole BergmanniD, Bradley E. TreebyiD, Charlotte Jane StaggiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS), has been shown to evoke visual evoked potential (VEP)-like potentials on EEG recordings, and also to modulate sensory evoked potentials. However, pulsed TUS is accompanied by an auditory confound, and it is possible that any observed effects were, in-part, evoked by this confound. Therefore, we used ramped TUS pulses, which are not as easily audible, to examine whether primary visual cortex (V1) TUS evokes VEP-like potentials, and modulates VEPs elicited using a checkerboard stimulus. MethodsWe tested 14 healthy participants (31 {+/-} 4.3 yrs, 4 F and 10 M). TUS was applied to the left V1 using a 270 kHz transducer (H115-2AA, Sonic Concepts). Ramped pulses (1 ms ramp, 3.25 ms total pulse duration) were repeated at 250 Hz, with a pulse train duration of 300 ms, an effective duty cycle of 50%, and Isppa without ramping of 16 W/cm2 in water. EEG was recorded from 16 channels using the g.USBamp amplifier (g.tec medical engineering GmbH). In two blocks (TUS-only), real and sham (100 each) TUS trials were repeated every 2 s. In another two blocks (TUS+checkerboard), a checkerboard stimulus was flipped every 0.5 s, and every fourth stimulus was associated with either a real or sham (100 each) TUS trial. The TUS trial started approx. 130 ms (0-5 ms jitter) before the checkerboard flip. All EEG data were analysed using Fieldtrip, and cluster-based permutation tests were used to test for differences between conditions. Results and discussionIn the TUS-only condition, in contrast to a previous study, we found no evoked potentials using ramped pulses which minimised the auditory artifact. In the TUS+checkerboard condition, we observed a modulation of the early-component of the VEP in real TUS, relative to no TUS trials. This suggests that, in line with in-vitro and animal data, there is a direct neuromodulatory effect of ultrasound, in addition to any confounding effects. Moving forward, ramping offers a relatively easy approach to minimise the auditory confound.

Citations
15
FWCI
1.18
Field percentile
top 26%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISDunsford '26Braun '20Kop '24Bortz '25Scott '26Mohammadjav '21
83% semantic matchNeuroscience
Suraya Dunsford, Keith R. Murphy, Ema Darrieutort+2 more·Brain stimulation·Jan 11, 2026· 1 citations