PLoS ONENeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Improving the learning curve in monoportal endoscopic lumbar surgery: development and validation of a porcine training model.
Laura Olías-OrtiziD, Rafael BlancoiD, Gloria Abizanda-Sarasa, Isabel Lacave-Mas, Carmen Valverde-GestosoiD, Matías AlfonsoiD
Abstract
Study designExperimental animal study. PurposeEndoscopic spine surgery (ESS) has gained substantial traction globally. Proficiency in ESS demands a steep learning curve and rigorous technical training. This study aims to develop and validate a porcine model as a high-fidelity, reproducible platform for hands-on training in lumbar endoscopic procedures. MethodsThirteen skeletally mature Landrace x Large white pigs underwent lumbar endoscopic decompression via a transforaminal approach at L4-L5 and an interlaminar approach at L5-L6. Specific procedural modifications were introduced to optimize anatomical correlation and surgical ergonomics. Following a seven-day postoperative period, necropsies were performed to evaluate procedural outcomes and adverse events. Operative times, intraoperative events, and postoperative outcomes were systematically recorded. ResultsEndoscopic decompression was successfully completed in all specimens. Mean operative time was 134.7 {+/-} 32.3 minutes. Intraoperative complications occurred in 4 animals (30.8%): uncontrollable epidural bleeding (case 1), dural tear (case 7), technically difficult transforaminal access in a low-weight pig (33.8 kg, case 8), and a complex interlaminar approach leading to spinal cord injury (case 13). One additional animal (case 4) developed paraplegia without structural findings at necropsy, attributed to intraoperative positioning. Necropsy revealed asymptomatic epidural hematomas in three cases (9, 11, 12). Three animals (23.1%) required early euthanasia based on humane criteria. A significant learning curve effect was demonstrated, with operative time decreasing over the series ({rho} = -0.73, p = 0.004). ConclusionsThe porcine lumbar spine provides a reliable and anatomically valid model for ESS training. Awareness of species-specific anatomy, specimen size, and positioning is essential to maximize reproducibility and safety.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 10th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Precision in Spinal Cord Injury Research: A Novel Electromagnetic Impactor for a Consistent Porcine Model
Leonard Steger, Abdul Karim Ghaith, … Amir Manbachi·Annals of Biomedical EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Sep 5, 2025
- Lumbar endplate microfracture injury induces Modic-like changes, intervertebral disc degeneration and spinal cord sensitization-An In Vivo Rat Model
D. Wang, A. Lai, … J. C. Iatridis·bioRxiv·Jan 27, 2023
- Intraoperative Spinal Cord Stimulation Mitigates Pain after Spine Surgery in Mice
Satoshi Yamamoto, Alexander Duong, … Jun‐Ho La·bioRxiv·Jun 9, 2022
- Kainic Acid Pig Model of Hippocampal Epilepsy
Filip Mívalt, Daniela D. Maltais, … Gregory A. Worrell·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 4, 2026
- Robust, long-term video EEG monitoring in a porcine model of post-traumatic epilepsy.
Luis F. Martinez-Ramirez, Andrea R. Slate, … Beth A. Costine·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2022
- Characterization and Applications of Evoked Responses During Epidural Electrical Stimulation
N. Verma, B. Romanauski, … M. Zhang·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2023