The Journal of NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Detection and Removal of Hyper-synchronous Artifacts in Massively Parallel Spike Recordings
Jonas Oberste-FrielinghausiD, Aitor Morales-GregorioiD, Simon EssinkiD, Alexander KleinjohanniD, Cristiano A. Köhler, Frédéric V. BarthélemyiD, Alexa Riehle CiD, Thomas G. BrochieriD, Simon MusalliD, Junji ItoiD, Sonja GrüniD
Abstract
Contemporary electrophysiology experiments often involve massively parallel recordings of neuronal activity using multi-electrode arrays. While researchers have been aware of artifacts arising from electric cross-talk between channels in setups for such recordings, systematic and quantitative assessment of the effects of those artifacts on the data quality has never been reported. Here we present, based on examination of electrophysiology recordings from multiple laboratories, that multi-electrode recordings of spiking activity commonly contain extremely precise (at the data sampling resolution) spike coincidences far above the chance level. We derive, through modeling of the electric cross-talk, a systematic relation between the amount of such hyper-synchronous events (HSEs) in channel pairs and the correlation between the raw signals of those channels in the multi-unit activity frequency range (500-7500 Hz). We show that whitening the band-pass filtered raw signals removes the above chance HSEs; strongly suggesting they originate from linear mixing of signals. Whitening should therefore be performed prior to spike sorting and any further analysis of precise spike correlation, otherwise analysis results may be considerably affected. Significance StatementArtifacts are ubiquitous in electrophysiological recordings. To mitigate their impact, these artifacts need to be detected and they should be removed from the data without impacting the quality of the data. This work presents measures to identify and quantify the amount of artifacts within a multichannel recording by evaluating the occurrence of hyper-synchronous events i.e., spikes that are synchronous on a sub-millisecond time scale, and further introduces zero-phase component analysis (ZCA) as a method to remove these artifacts from the data. Thus, we recommend to use ZCA as a general preprocessing for electrophysiological recordings.
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- top 49%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The effect of data preprocessing on spike correlation analysis results
Jonas Oberste-Frielinghaus, Junji Ito, Sonja Grün·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2025
- ERAASR: An algorithm for removing electrical stimulation artifacts from multielectrode array recordings
Daniel J. O’Shea, K.V. Shenoy·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2017
- Electrical Stimulus Artifact Cancellation and Neural Spike Detection on Large Multi-Electrode Arrays
Gonzalo E. Mena, Lauren E. Grosberg, … Liam Paninski·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 13, 2017
- Recent progress in multi-electrode spike sorting methods
Baptiste Lefebvre, Pierre Yger, Olivier Marre·Journal of Physiology-ParisPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2016
- Unsupervised spike sorting for large scale, high density multielectrode arrays
Gerrit Hilgen, Martino Sorbaro, … Matthias H. Hennig·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2017
- How do spike collisions affect spike sortingperformance?
Samuel Garcia, Alessio Paolo Buccino, Pierre Yger·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2022