bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint
Rhythmic variation in proteomics: challenges and opportunities for statistical power and biomarker identification
Matt P. SpickiD, C IsherwoodiD, Lee A. GethingsiD, Hana HassaniniD, Daan R. van der VeeniD, Debra Jean SkeneiD, Jonathan D. JohnstoniD
Abstract
Time-of-day variation in the molecular profile of biofluids and tissues is a well-described phenomenon, but - especially for proteomics - is rarely considered in terms of the challenges this presents to reproducible biomarker identification. In this work we demonstrate these confounding issues using a small-scale proteomics analysis of male participants in a constant routine protocol following an 8-day laboratory study, in which sleep-wake, light-dark and meal timings were controlled. We provide a case study analysis of circadian and ultradian rhythmicity in proteins in the complement and coagulation cascades, as well as apolipoproteins, and demonstrate that rhythmicity increases the risk of Type II errors due to the reduction in statistical power from increased variance. For the proteins analysed herein we show that to maintain statistical power if chronobiological variation is not controlled for, n should be increased (by between 9% and 20%); failure to do so would increase {beta}, the chance of Type II error, from a baseline value of 20% to between 22% and 28%. Conversely, controlling for rhythmic time-of-day variation in study design offers the opportunity to improve statistical power and reduce the chances of Type II errors. Indeed, control of time-of-day sampling is a more cost-effective strategy than increasing sample sizes. We recommend that best practice in proteomics study design should account for temporal variation as part of sampling strategy where possible. Where this is impractical, we recommend that additional variance from chronobiological effects be considered in power calculations, that time of sampling be reported as part of study metadata, and that researchers reference any previously identified rhythmicity in biomarkers and pathways of interest. These measures would mitigate against both false and missed discoveries, and improve reproducibility, especially in studies looking at biomarkers, pathways or conditions with a known chronobiological component.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Short-term, long-term, and genetic determinants of human plasma proteome variability
David Benacom, Adrien Specht, … Emmanuel Jean-Marie Mignot·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2026
- Circadian time series proteomics reveals daily dynamics in cartilage physiology
M. Dudek, C. Angelucci, … Q.-J. Meng·bioRxiv·May 31, 2019
- Population-scale molecular reconstruction of human circadian phase from blood biomarkers
Clara Albiñana, Rebecca Claire Richmond, … Naomi R. Wray·medRxiv·Jul 13, 2026
- Proteomic Analysis of Rat Serum Revealed the Effects of Chronic Sleep Deprivation on Metabolic, Cardiovascular and Nervous System
Bo Ma, Jincheng Chen, … Jianxun Liu·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 20, 2018
- A Statistical Guideline for Analyzing Repeated-Measures Proteomics Data
Mikkel Skjoldan Svenningsen, Julie Lyng Forman, Alicia Lundby·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2026
- Is Protein Quantification and Physical Normalization Always Necessary in Proteomics?
Alex Zelter, Michael E. Riffle, … Michael J. MacCoss·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2026