SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification using droplet digital RT-PCR
Natalie N. KinlochiD, Gordon RitchieiD, Winnie W. Y. DongiD, Kyle D. CobarrubiasiD, Hanwei SudderuddiniD, Tanya Lawson, Nancy MaticiD, Julio S. G. MontaneriD, Victor C. M. LeungiD, Marc G. RomneyiD, Christopher F. LoweiD, Chanson J. BrummeiD, Zabrina L. BrummeiD
Abstract
Quantitative viral load assays have transformed our understanding of - and ability to manage - viral diseases. They hold similar potential to advance COVID-19 control and prevention, but SARS-CoV-2 viral load tests are not yet widely available. SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostic tests, which typically employ real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), yield semi-quantitative results only. Reverse transcriptase droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR), a technology that partitions each reaction into 20,000 nanolitre-sized droplets prior to amplification, offers an attractive platform for SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification. We evaluated eight primer/probe sets originally developed for real-time RT-PCR-based SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests for use in RT-ddPCR, and identified three (Charite-Berlin E-Sarbeco and Pasteur Institute IP2 and IP4) as the most efficient, precise and sensitive for RT-ddPCR-based SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification. Analytical efficiency of the E-Sarbeco primer/probe set, for example, was ~83%, while assay precision, as measured by the coefficient of variation, was ~2% at 1000 input copies/reaction. Lower limits of quantification and detection for this primer/probe set were 18.6 and 4.4 input SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies/reaction, respectively. SARS-CoV-2 RNA viral loads in a convenience panel of 48 COVID-19-positive diagnostic specimens spanned a 6.2log10 range, confirming substantial viral load variation in vivo. We further calibrated RT-ddPCR-derived SARS-CoV-2 E gene copy numbers against cycle threshold (Ct) values from a commercial real-time RT-PCR diagnostic platform. The resulting log-linear relationship can be used to mathematically derive SARS-CoV-2 RNA copy numbers from Ct values, allowing the wealth of available diagnostic test data to be harnessed to address foundational questions in SARS-CoV-2 biology.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 30
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Robust and sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 using PCR based methods
- SARS-CoV2 quantification using RT-dPCR: a faster and safer alternative to assist viral genomic copies assessment using RT-qPCR
Paula Rodrigues de Almeida, Meriane Demoliner, … Fernando Rosado Spilki·bioRxiv·May 1, 2020
- Evaluation of Different PCR Assay Formats for Sensitive and Specific Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA
J. Ratcliff, D. Nguyen, … P. Simmonds·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2020
- An Inexpensive RT-PCR Endpoint Diagnostic Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Using Nested PCR: Direct Assessment of Detection Efficiency of RT-qPCR Tests and Suitability for Surveillance
Jayeshkumar Narsibhai Davda, Keith Frank, … Imran Siddiqi·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2020
- Novel RT-ddPCR assays for determining the transcriptional profile of SARS-CoV-2
S. Telwatte, N. Kumar, … S. A. Yukl·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2021
- Optimized qRT-PCR approach for the detection of intra- and extracellular SARS-CoV-2 RNAs