bioRxivScientific Communication & Education
Delineating Medical Education: Bibliometric Research Approach(es)
L. A. Maggio, A. Ninkov, J. R. Frank, J. A. Costello, A. R. Artino
Abstract
BackgroundThe field of medical education remains poorly delineated such that there is no broad consensus of the articles and journals that comprise "the field." This lack of consensus has implications for conducting bibliometric studies and other research designs (e.g., systematic reviews); it also challenges the field to compare citation scores in the field and across others and for an individual to identify themselves as "a medical education researcher." Other fields have utilized bibliometric field delineation, which is the assigning of articles or journals to a certain field in an effort to define that field. ProcessIn this Research Approach, three bibliometric field delineation approaches -- information retrieval, core journals, and journal co-citation -- are introduced. For each approach, the authors describe their attempt to apply it in the medical education context and identify related strengths and weaknesses. Based on co-citation, the authors propose the Medical Education Journal List 24 (MEJ-24), as a starting point for delineating medical education and invite the community to collaborate on improving and potentially expanding this list. PearlsAs a research approach, field delineation is complicated, and there is no clear best way to delineate the field of medical education. However, recent advances in information and computer science provide potentially more fruitful approaches to deal with the complexity of the field. When considering these emerging approaches, researchers should consider collaborating with bibliometricians. Bibliometric approaches rely on available metadata for articles and journals, which necessitates that researchers examine the metadata prior to analysis to understand its strengths and weaknesses, and to assess how this might affect their data interpretation. While using bibliometric approaches for field delineation is valuable, it is important to remember that these techniques are only as good as the research teams interpretation of the data, which suggests that an expanded research approach is needed to better delineate medical education, an approach that includes active discussion within the medical education community.
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Expanding Interdisciplinarity: A bibliometric study of medical education using the MEJ-24
L. Maggio, J. A. Costello, … A. R. Artino·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2023
- Knowledge syntheses in medical education: A bibliometric analysis
L. A. Maggio, J. A. Costello, … A. R. Artino·bioRxiv·May 12, 2020
- The Voices of Medical Education Science: Describing the Published Landscape
L. Maggio, J. Costello, … A. R. Artino·bioRxiv·Feb 10, 2022
- Scoping reviews in medical education: A scoping review
L. A. Maggio, K. Larsen, … A. R. Artino·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2020
- Two Similarity Metrics for Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): An Aid to Biomedical Text Mining and Author Name Disambiguation
Neil R Smalheiser, Gary Bonifield·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2016
- Wikipedia as a gateway to biomedical research: The relative distribution and use of citations in the English Wikipedia
L. A. Maggio, J. Willinsky, … T. Dong·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2017