bioRxivBioengineeringPreprint
Electroencephalography for Radiation-Free Orientation Estimation of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Leads
S. Maiti, A. Bince Jacob, M. Mancuso, M. T. Krueger, H. Akram, K. Aristovich, V. Litvak
Abstract
Background: Programming segmented deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads requires knowledge of their rotational orientation, but current postoperative workflows rely mainly on radiographic imaging. Objective: To develop and evaluate a radiation-free electroencephalography (EEG) framework for directional lead orientation estimation, in a realistic phantom and postoperative human data. Methods: A realistic head phantom containing a directional DBS lead was mounted on a rotating tray and stepped through known orientations in 5{degrees} increments to evaluate EEG-based orientation estimation. Stimulation artefact topographies were compared with forward-model predictions using Pearson correlation, and a tri-montage approach combined estimates from all three same-ring electrode pairs to improve accuracy. Robustness was tested by adding brain noise and reducing the electrode count. The method was then applied to a patient with bilateral directional DBS leads implanted in the globus pallidus. Robustness in the human data was assessed by reducing the sampling rate and the number of EEG electrodes. Results: In the phantom, the best simplified forward model was a tangential BEM dipole positioned midway between the active contacts. The tri-montage reduced the maximal mean orientation error to 0.59{degrees} (95% CI: 4.4{degrees}). A conservative tray-position analysis yielded a pooled mean error of 2.05{degrees} (95% CI: 3.20{degrees}). In the human dataset, EEG-derived orientations differed from imaging-based references by about 8{degrees} for the right lead and 15{degrees} for the left lead, and remained stable after downsampling and montage reduction. Conclusions: Phantom validation established the key modelling assumptions, and postoperative human recordings showed that EEG can recover clinically plausible directional lead orientations under realistic conditions.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Directional DBS Leads Show Large Deviations from their Intended Implantation Orientation
Till A. Dembek, Moritz Hoevels, … Harald Treuer·Parkinsonism & Related DisordersPeer-reviewed·Aug 27, 2019
- Artifacts can be deceiving: The actual location of deep brain stimulation electrodes differs from the artifact seen on magnetic resonance images
Noa B Nuzov, Bhumi Bhusal, … Laleh Golestanirad·Stereotactic and Functional NeurosurgeryPeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2022
- Orientation of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Leads on CT: Resolving the Ambiguity
Rebecca Kurtev-Rittstieg, Stefan Achatz, … Stephan Mittermeyer·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2020
- Deep Brain Stimulation: Imaging on a group level
Svenja Treu, Bryan Andrew Strange, … Andreas Horn·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 4, 2020
- Experimental Validation of Finite Element Models for Directional DBS: The Critical Role of Boundary Conditions on VTA Accuracy
Kaylee R. Henry, Fuchang Jiang, … Laleh Golestanirad·bioRxiv·Apr 7, 2026
- Evaluating the Influence of Anatomical Accuracy and Electrode Positions on EEG Forward Solutions
Jesper Duemose Nielsen, Oula Puonti, … Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2023