bioRxivPharmacology & ToxicologyPreprint
Cell Painting and machine learning for mechanistic profiling of hepatotoxic botanicals and their constituents
Guillaume OllitraultiD, Constance A. MitchelliD, Stephen FergusoniD, Amy L. Roe, Brandon WhiteiD, Katherine TittertoniD, Jessica EwaldiD
Abstract
BACKGROUND Botanicals are widely consumed as herbal remedies and plant-derived products, but their complex and variable chemical composition presents major challenges for safety assessment. Although hepatotoxicity has been reported for several botanicals, the constituent compounds responsible and the underlying mechanisms often remain poorly characterised. OBJECTIVES We aimed to determine whether Cell Painting could identify candidate constituent drivers of botanical bioactivity and generate hypotheses about potential mechanisms of action in primary human hepatocytes. METHODS We profiled 13 botanical extracts and 85 known constituents across multiple concentrations using Cell Painting alongside assays of metabolic activity and membrane integrity. To interpret morphological phenotypes, we trained machine-learning models using a Cell Painting reference atlas of >1,000 chemicals linked to ToxCast/Tox21 molecular and cellular bioactivity annotations. RESULTS Cell Painting detected bioactivity in 11/13 botanical extracts and 46/85 constituents, compared with 9/13 extracts and 40/85 constituents in the cell-health assays, and generally detected activity at lower concentrations. For 9/13 extracts, at least one constituent was active at a lower concentration than the corresponding botanical extract, supporting the contribution of a subset of potent constituents to mixture-level responses. Aristolochia and goldenseal were the most potent extracts across Cell Painting and cell-health assays and contained highly active constituents. Reference-atlas models generated specific mechanistic hypotheses, including cytotoxicity-, endocrine-, and genotoxicity-associated responses for several botanicals and constituents. CONCLUSION These results support Cell Painting combined with machine learning as a sensitive approach for characterising cellular responses to botanicals, prioritising candidate constituent drivers of hepatotoxicity-associated phenotypes, and generating testable hypotheses about potential mechanisms of action.
- organism: human
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cell Painting for cytotoxicity and mode-of-action analysis in primary human hepatocytes
Jessica Ewald, Katherine Titterton, … Shantanu Singh·Cell SystemsPeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2026
- In vitro hepatotoxicity assessment of Lippia javanica (Burm.f.) Spreng. aqueous leaf extract
B. Swanepoel, T. C. Koekemoer, … M. van de Venter·bioRxiv·May 26, 2021
- Reference compounds for characterizing cellular injury in high-content cellular morphology assays
J. L. Dahlin, B. K. Hua, … B. K. Wagner·bioRxiv·Jul 12, 2022
- From Pixels to Phenotypes: Integrating Image-Based Profiling with Cell Health Data Improves Interpretability
S. Seal, J. Carreras-Puigvert, … A. Bender·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2023
- Applying Cell Painting in Non-Tumorigenic Breast Cells to Understand Impacts of Common Chemical Exposures
Anagha Tapaswi, Nicholas I. Cemalovic, … Justin A. Colacino·Toxicology in VitroPeer-reviewed·May 3, 2024
- Cell Painting-Based Tool for the Risk Assessment of Mammary Carcinogens and Endocrine Disruptors
Rayane Achebouche, Olivier Taboureau·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2026