Cell Painting-Based Tool for the Risk Assessment of Mammary Carcinogens and Endocrine Disruptors
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide and chemicals disrupting estrogen or progesterone signaling are recognized as potential risk factors. However, chemicals that alter the mammary gland (MG) development and function remain understudied, highlighting the need for additional research in this area. To address this gap, we investigate the relevance of using high-content imaging assays and more specifically, Cell Painting technology to measure cell morphology perturbation caused by chemical exposure and identify morphological features that could characterize mammary carcinogens (MC) risk factors. Using a dataset of MC and non-mammary carcinogens (Non-MC) with Cell Painting profiles from the JUMP-CP dataset, we retrieved 51 compounds: 28 MC, 23 non-genotoxic Non-MC. We characterized the morphological data by non-linear dimensionality reduction (UMAP) and hierarchical clustering. We, then, developed a Guilt-By-Association (GBA) framework comparing multiple configurations of similarity metrics, risk-score aggregation approaches and features representations. Morphological profiles clustered by mechanism of action rather than carcinogenicity label: genotoxic MC produced strong perturbations in endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, nucleus, and RNA compartments, whereas hormonally active compounds were indistinguishable from controls, reflecting the lack of functional steroid hormone receptors in the cell line used. Our best GBA configuration achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.630 and an AUC-PR of 0.696. Applied prospectively to endocrine disruptors chemicals, it prioritized clofentezine, 3-methylpyrazole, resorcinol, 2-tert-butyl-4-methoxyphenol, and thiabendazole as candidates for confirmatory testing. This study provides a transparent, interpretable tool for prioritizing chemicals in mammary carcinogenicity assessment, highlights limitations and clarifies where Cell Painting datasets must be complemented by hormone-sensitive models.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Applying Cell Painting in Non-Tumorigenic Breast Cells to Understand Impacts of Common Chemical Exposures
Anagha Tapaswi, Nicholas I. Cemalovic, … Justin A. Colacino·Toxicology in VitroPeer-reviewed·May 3, 2024
- Cell Painting for cytotoxicity and mode-of-action analysis in primary human hepatocytes
Jessica Ewald, Katherine Titterton, … Shantanu Singh·Cell SystemsPeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2026
- High Throughput Transcriptomics to Understand Chemical Drivers of Aggressive Breast Cancer Subtypes
K. E. Sala-Hamrick, A. Tapaswi, … J. A. Colacino·bioRxiv·Nov 16, 2022
- From Pixels to Phenotypes: Integrating Image-Based Profiling with Cell Health Data Improves Interpretability
S. Seal, J. Carreras-Puigvert, … A. Bender·Molecular Biology of the CellPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2024
- Cell Painting and machine learning for mechanistic profiling of hepatotoxic botanicals and their constituents
Guillaume Ollitrault, Constance A. Mitchell, … Jessica Ewald·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2026
- Exploring the Influence of Chemical Exposures in Breast Cancer Disparities: High-Throughput Transcriptomic Analysis in Normal Breast Cells from Diverse Donors
Neil Zhao, Peiyao Zhao, … Justin A. Colacino·bioRxiv·Feb 24, 2026