ACS ES&T WaterMicrobiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
In-situ calibration of passive samplers for monitoring host-associated fecal markers in an urban river
Yawen LiuiD, Rory VerhageniD, Metasebia Gebrewold, Wendy J. M. SmithiD, Darryl William Hawker, Stuart L. SimpsoniD, Warish AhmediD
Abstract
Passive sampling in aquatic environments has shown promise as a time- and cost-efficient method with improved sensitivity for detecting microbial pollution in dynamic and variable conditions. However, quantitative descriptions of its field performance have been scarce, impeding its broader application in environmental settings. The performance of two membrane-based passive samplers (Torpedo and MSTFlow) in quantifying human (Carjivirus, Pepper Mild Mottle Virus [PMMoV], Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus [ToBRFV]) and avian (Helicobacter spp. GFD marker) fecal pollution markers in an urban riverine environment over a 72-h deployment was evaluated using a first-order kinetic model to characterize their microbial adsorption characteristics. Results were compared with those from parallel composite and time-weighted auto-sampling. Accumulation in passive samplers exhibited an initial lag phase (0 to 8 h for viruses) and reached equilibrium within 16 h of initial deployment, except for GFD. Sampling rates were highest for PMMoV (6.29 and 5.11 mL/h) for MSTFlow and Torpedo samplers respectively, followed by Carjivirus (4.63 and 3.63 mL/h), ToBRFV (2.17 and 1.22 mL/h) and GFD (0.68 mL/h in Torpedo sampler). At equilibrium, both sampler configurations accumulated more than 22-170 times the amount of target gene copies in each mL of grab water samples depending on sampler and virus. These findings highlight passive sampling as a promising, sensitive, cost-effective, and low-maintenance alternative for continuous microbial water quality monitoring in aquatic environments. Overall, this study advances the understanding of passive sampling kinetics and supports broader adoption of passive samplers for tracking fecal pollution in environmental waters.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Field percentile
- top 48%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Viral adsorption to Moore swabs in passive wastewater sampling
Gouthami Rao, Timothy Purvis, … Joe M. Brown·bioRxiv·May 30, 2025
- Mechanistic assessment of eDNA passive samplers: a case study with invasive freshwater bivalves
Anish A. Kirtane, Alexandra Anh‐Thu Weber·bioRxiv·Aug 11, 2026
- Implementation and Integration of Microbial Source Tracking in a River Watershed Monitoring Plan
E. Balleste, K. Demeter, … W. G. Meijer·bioRxiv·Jan 7, 2019
- Using Watershed Characteristics for Improving Fecal Source Identification
J. J. Hart, M. N. Jamison, … R. R. Rediske·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2022
- Metagenome-based comparisons of decay rates and host-specificity of fecal microbial communities for improved microbial source tracking
B. Suttner, B. G. Lindner, … K. T. Konstantinidis·bioRxiv·Jun 17, 2021
- Assessment of a Passive Sampler for Aquifer Microbial Community Profiling and Comparison of Porous Media Applied in a Managed Recharge Scenario
Mia Riddley, Haeil Byeon, … Jingqiu Liao·Water Environment ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2026