Physiological Profiles of Male and Female CrossFit Athletes
D. Hodzic, G. D'Hulst, R. Leuenberger, J. Arnet, E. Westerhuis, R. Roth, A. Schmidt-Trucksass, R. Knaier, J. Wagner
Abstract
ObjectiveTo 1) establish extensive physiological profiles of highly-trained CrossFit athletes using gold-standard tests and 2) investigate which physiological markers best correlate with CrossFit(R) Open performance. MethodsThis study encompassed sixty participants (30 males and 30 females), all within the top 5% of the CrossFit(R) Open, including 7 CrossFit(R) Semi-finalists and 3 Games finalists. Isokinetic dynamometers were employed to measure maximum isometric and isokinetic leg and trunk strength. Countermovement jump height and maximum isometric mid-thigh pull strength were assessed on a force plate. V{square}O2peak was measured by a cardiopulmonary exercise test, while critical power and W were evaluated during a 3-minute all-out test, both on a cycle ergometer. ResultsMale and female athletes median (IQR) V{square}O2peak was 4.64 (4.43, 4.80) and 3.21 (3.10, 3.29) (L{middle dot}min-1), critical power 314.5 (285.9, 343.6) and 221.3 (200.9, 238.9) (W) and mid-thigh pull 3158 (2690, 3462) and 2035 (1728, 2347) (N). Linear regression analysis shows strong evidence for associations between different anthropometric variables and CrossFit(R) Open performance in men and women, whereas for markers of cardiorespiratory fitness such as V{square}O2peak this was only true for women but not men. Conventional laboratory evaluations of strength, however, manifest minimal evidence for associations with Open performance across both sexes. ConclusionsThis study provides the first detailed insights into the physiology of high-performing CrossFit(R) athletes and informs training optimization. Further the results emphasize the advantage of athletes with shorter limbs and suggests potential modifications to Open workout designs to level the playing field for athletes across different anthropometrics characteristics.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Physiological predictors of competitive performance in CrossFit(R) athletes
L. Brea, R. Martinez-Gomez, … D. Barranco-Gil·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2019
- PHYSIOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ADVANCED CROSSFIT ATHLETES, RECREATIONAL CROSSFIT PARTICIPANTS, AND PHYSICALLY-ACTIVE ADULTS
G. Mangine, M. T. Stratton, … Y. Feito·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2019
- Sex differences in the cardiopulmonary and neuromuscular response to high-intensity interval exercise
Hannah Wilson, Lina Bernert, … Paul Ansdell·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·May 19, 2025
- No sex differences in oxygen uptake or extraction kinetics in the moderate or heavy exercise intensity domains
M. Solleiro Pons, L. Bernert, … P. Ansdell·bioRxiv·Jun 26, 2023
- Do anthropometric characteristics and physical capacities of highly trained junior badminton players differ according to age and sex?
Bagus Winata, Joana Brochhagen, … Matthias Hoppe·Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingPeer-reviewed·Nov 27, 2025
- Training load and body composition in adults practicing cyclical exercises
Raquel Suelen Brito da Silva, Marizângela Ferreira de Souza, … Alexandre Sérgio Silva·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2019