Physiological predictors of competitive performance in CrossFit(R) athletes
L. Brea, R. Martinez-Gomez, P. Valenzuela, J. Gil-Cabrera, A. Montalvo-Perez, E. Talavera, A. Lucia, S. Moral-Gonzalez, D. Barranco-Gil
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine which physiological variables could predict performance during a CrossFit competition. Fifteen male CrossFit athletes (35 {+/-} 9 years) participated and performed a series of tests (incremental load test for full squat and bench press, jump tests, incremental running test, and Wingate test) that were used as potential predictors of CrossFit performance. Thereafter, they performed the five Workouts of the Day (WODs) corresponding to the CrossFit Games Open 2019, and the relationship between each variable and CrossFit performance was analyzed. Overall Crossfit performance (i.e., final ranking considering all WODs) was significantly related to jump ability, mean and peak power output during the Wingate test, relative maximum strength for the full squat and the bench press, and maximum oxygen uptake and maximum speed during an incremental running test (all p<0.05, r=0.58-0.75), although the relationship of most markers varied depending on the analyzed WOD. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the combination of maximum oxygen uptake, squat jump ability, and reactive strength index accounted for 81% of the variance in overall CrossFit performance (p=0.0003). CrossFit performance seems dependent on a variety of power-, strength-, and aerobic-related markers, which reflects the complexity of this sport. Improvements in aerobic capacity may help people and athletes in CrossFit performance and well-being. Also, focus on lower body power could be the key to obtain better performance markers.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Physiological Profiles of Male and Female CrossFit Athletes
D. Hodzic, G. D'Hulst, … J. Wagner·bioRxiv·Oct 11, 2023
- PHYSIOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ADVANCED CROSSFIT ATHLETES, RECREATIONAL CROSSFIT PARTICIPANTS, AND PHYSICALLY-ACTIVE ADULTS
G. Mangine, M. T. Stratton, … Y. Feito·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2019
- The effects of morning priming exercise on afternoon physical and cognitive performance in male rugby union players
Jamie Knight, Mark A. Russell, … Liam Patrick Kilduff·bioRxiv·May 29, 2025
- VO2max prediction based on submaximal cardiorespiratory relationships and body composition in male runners and cyclists: a population study
S. Wiecha, P. S. Kasiak, … A. Klusiewicz·bioRxiv·Feb 3, 2023
- Metabolic Responses of Different Levels of Fitness
Iñigo San-Millán, Janel L. Martinez·bioRxiv·Dec 27, 2025
- Shorter constant work rate cycling tests as proxies for longer tests in highly trained cyclists
C. du Plessis, M. Andrews, … A. Blazevich·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2021