PHYSIOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ADVANCED CROSSFIT ATHLETES, RECREATIONAL CROSSFIT PARTICIPANTS, AND PHYSICALLY-ACTIVE ADULTS

Abstract

This investigation examined anthropometric, hormonal, and physiological differences between advanced (ADV; n = 8, 27.8 {+/-} 4.2 years, 170 {+/-} 11 cm, 79.8 {+/-} 13.3 kg) and recreational (REC; n = 8, 33.5 {+/-} 8.1 years, 172 {+/-} 14 cm, 76.3 {+/-} 19.5 kg) CrossFit (CF) trained participants in comparison to physically-active controls (CON; n = 7, 27.5 {+/-} 6.7 years, 171 {+/-} 14 cm, 74.5 {+/-} 14.3 kg). ADV and REC were distinguished by their past competitive success. REC and CON were resistance-trained (>2 years) and exercised on 3-5 days{middle dot}wk-1 for the past year, but CON utilized traditional resistance and cardiovascular exercise. All participants provided a fasted, resting blood sample and completed assessments of resting metabolic rate, body composition, muscle morphology, isometric mid-thigh pull strength, peak aerobic capacity, and a 3-minute maximal cycle ergometer sprint across two separate occasions (separated by 3-7 days). Blood samples were analyzed for testosterone, cortisol, and insulin-like growth factor-1. One-way analysis of variance revealed ADV to possess lower body fat percentage (6.7-8.3%, p = 0.007), greater bone and non-bone lean mass (12.5-26.8%, p [≤] 0.028), muscle morphology characteristics (14.2-59.9%, p < 0.05), isometric strength characteristics (15.4-41.8%, p < 0.05), peak aerobic capacity (18.8-19.1%, p = 0.002), and anaerobic performance (15.4-51.1%, p [≤] 0.023) compared to both REC and CON. No differences were seen between REC and CON, or between all groups for resting metabolic rate or hormone concentrations. These data suggest ADV possess several physiological advantages over REC and CON, whereas similar physiological characteristics were present in individuals who have been regularly participating in either CF or resistance and cardiovascular training for the past year.