Robust conformational space exploration of cyclic peptides by combining different MD protocols and force fields
Samuel MurailiD, Jaysen SawmynadeniD, Akli ZemirliiD, Maud JusotiD, Fabio PietrucciiD, Jacques ChomilieriD, Pierre TufféryiD, Dirk StratmanniD
Abstract
Cyclic peptides are an important class of pharmaceutical drugs. We used here replica-exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) and simulated tempering (ST) simulations to explore the conformational landscape of a set of nine cyclic peptides. The N-ter to C-ter backbone cyclized peptides of seven to ten residues were previously designed for a high conformational stability with a mixture of L and D amino acids. Their experimental NMR structures were available in the protein data bank (PDB). For each peptide we tested several force fields, Amber96, Amber14, RSFF2C and Charmm36m in implicit and explicit solvent. We find that the variability of the free energy maps obtained from several protocols is larger than the variability obtained by just repeating the same protocol. Running multiple protocols is therefore important for the convergence assessment of REMD or ST simulations. The majority of the free energy maps showed clusters with a high RMSD to the native structures, revealing the residual flexibility of this set of cyclic peptides. The high RMSD clusters had in some cases the lowest free energy, rendering the prediction of the native structure more difficult with a single protocol. Fortunately, the combination of four implicit solvent REMD and ST simulations, mixing the Amber96 and Am-ber14 force fields, predicted robustly the native structure. As implicit solvent in the REMD or ST setup are up to one hundred times faster than explicit solvent simulations, so running four implicit solvent simulations is a good practical choice. We checked that the use of an explicit solvent REMD or ST simulation, taken alone or combined with implicit solvent simulations, did not significantly improved our results. It results that our combination of four implicit solvent simulations is tied in terms of success rate with much more expensive combinations that include explicit solvent simulations. This may be used as guideline for further studies of cyclic peptide conformations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Field percentile
- top 15%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Accelerated ensemble generation for cyclic peptides using a Reservoir-REMD implementation in GROMACS
S. C. C. Hsueh, A. Aina, S. S. Plotkin·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2022
- Heuristic energy-based cyclic peptide design
Qiyao Zhu, Vikram Khipple Mulligan, Dennis E. Shasha·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 30, 2025
- Cyclome: Large-scale replica-exchange dynamics of 930 cyclic peptide reveal thermal stability and critical metal-binding behavior
Karuna Anna Sajeevan, Hannah Gates, … Ratul Chowdhury·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2026
- Exhaustive exploration of the conformational landscape of small cyclic peptides using a robotics approach
Maud Jusot, Dirk Stratmann, … Juan Cortés·Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingPeer-reviewed·Oct 9, 2018
- A Cyclisation and Docking Protocol for Cyclic Peptide-Protein Modelling using HADDOCK2.4
Vicky Charitou, Siri Camee van Keulen, Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin·bioRxiv·Jan 21, 2022
- Protocol for Membrane Permeability Prediction of Cyclic Peptides using Descriptors Obtained from Extended Ensemble Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Chemical Structures
Masatake Sugita, Yudai Noso, … Yutaka Akiyama·ACS OmegaPeer-reviewed·Jun 30, 2026