Response learning confounds accurate assays of inhibitory control
J. O. van Horik, C. E. Beardsworth, P. Laker, M. A. Whiteside, J. R. Madden
Abstract
The ability to inhibit prepotent actions towards rewards that are made inaccessible by transparent barriers has been considered to reflect capacities for inhibitory control (IC). Typically, subjects initially reach directly, and incorrectly, for the reward. With experience, subjects may inhibit this action and instead detour around barriers to access the reward. However, assays of IC are often measured across multiple trials, with the location of the reward remaining constant. Consequently, other cognitive processes, such as response learning (acquisition of a motor routine), may confound accurate assays of IC. We measured baseline IC capacities in pheasant chicks, Phasianus colchicus, using a transparent cylinder task. Birds were then divided into two training treatments, where they learned to access a reward placed behind a transparent barrier, but experienced differential reinforcement of a particular motor response. In the Stationary-Barrier treatment, the location of the barrier remained constant across trials. We therefore reinforced a fixed motor response, such as always go left, which birds could learn to aid their performance. Conversely, we alternated the location of the barrier across trials for birds in the Moving-Barrier treatment, and hence provided less reinforcement of their response learning. All birds then experienced a second presentation of the transparent cylinder task to assess whether differences in the training treatments influenced their subsequent capacities for IC. Birds in the Stationary-Barrier treatment showed a greater improvement in their subsequent IC performance after training compared to birds in the Moving-Barrier treatment. We therefore suggest that response learning aids IC performance on detour tasks. Consequently, non-target cognitive processes associated with different neural substrates appear to underlie performances on detour tasks, which may confound accurate assays of IC. Our findings question the construct validity of a commonly used paradigm that is widely considered to assess capacities for IC in humans and other animals.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Inhibitory control performance is repeatable across years and contexts in a wild bird population
G. Davidson, M. S. Reichert, … J. Quinn·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2021
- Learning and motor inhibitory control in crows and domestic chickens
C. A. F. Wascher, K. Allen, G. Szipl·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2020
- Removal of reinforcement improves instrumental performance in humans by decreasing a general action bias rather than unmasking learnt associations
Hannah Kurtenbach, Eduard Ort, … Gerhard Jocham·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 8, 2022
- Flexible control of Pavlovian-instrumental transfer based on expected reward value
A. T. Marshall, S. B. Ostlund, … C. Hutson·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2021
- Conditional Freezing, Flight and Darting?
J. M. Trott, A. N. Hoffman, … M. Fanselow·bioRxiv·Dec 2, 2021
- Two types of response inhibition failures in humans
Stein F. Acker, Jan R. Wessel·bioRxiv·Aug 8, 2026