Two types of response inhibition failures in humans
Abstract
Response inhibition is a key control function that allows humans to perform safe, goal-directed behaviors. The dominant behavioral-computational model holds that response inhibition fails when the inhibition process is too slow to intercept unwanted movements. However, many have hypothesized that some inhibitory failures instead result from a failure to launch the inhibition process altogether. Since no method exists to identify individual trigger failure (TF) trials, they are hitherto a largely hypothetical phenomenon. We combined Bayesian process-mixture modeling with likelihood ratio testing and jackknife resampling to identify TF trials in 253 humans. We find that TF indeed represent a separate category from other inhibitory failures. Unlike other inhibitory failures, TF do not result from premature responses. Furthermore, TF lack a stop-signal P3 event-related potential, a neural index of response inhibition. Surprisingly, TF do not result from perceptual/attentional lapses. Thus, TF are a qualitatively distinct class of executive failure during response inhibition.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reconsidering electrophysiological markers of response inhibition in light of trigger failures in the stop-signal task
Patrick Skippen, William Ross Fulham, … Frini Karayanidis·PsychophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2020
- Right inferior frontal cortex damage impairs the initiation of inhibitory control, but not its implementation
Yoojeong Choo, Dóra Matzke, … Jan R. Wessel·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 19, 2022
- A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping
Corey George Wadsley, John Cirillo, … Winston D. Byblow·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Jun 19, 2023
- Motor Output Matters: Evidence of a Continuous Relationship Between Stop/No-go P300 Amplitude and Response Force on Failed Inhibitions at the Trial-Level.
An T. Nguyen, Matthew A. Albrecht, … Welber Marinovic·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2019
- Dissociating Attentional Capture from Action Cancellation in the Stop Signal Task
Simon Weber, Sauro E. Salomoni, … Mark R. Hinder·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2022
- Response learning confounds accurate assays of inhibitory control
J. O. van Horik, C. E. Beardsworth, … J. R. Madden·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2019