Inhibitory control performance is repeatable across years and contexts in a wild bird population
G. Davidson, M. S. Reichert, J. R. Coomes, I. Kulahci, I. de la Hera, J. Quinn
Abstract
Inhibitory control is one of several cognitive mechanisms required for self-regulation, decision making and attention towards tasks. Linked to a variety of maladaptive behaviours in humans, inhibitory control is expected to influence behavioural plasticity in animals in the context of foraging, social interaction, or responses to sudden changes in the environment. One widely used cognitive assay, the detour task, putatively tests inhibitory control. In this task, subjects must avoid impulsively touching transparent barriers positioned in front of food, and instead access the food by an alternative but known route. Recently it has been suggested that the detour task is unreliable and measures factors unrelated to inhibitory control, including motivation, previous experience and persistence. Consequently, there is growing uncertainty as to whether this task leads to erroneous interpretations about animal cognition and its links with socio-ecological traits. To address these outstanding concerns, we designed a variant of the detour task for wild great tits (Parus major) and deployed it at the nesting site of the same individuals across two spring seasons. This approach eliminated the use of food rewards, limited social confounds, and maximised motivation. We compared task performance in the wild with their performance in captivity when tested using the classical cylinder detour task during the non-breeding season. Task performance was temporally and contextually repeatable, and none of the confounds had any significant effect on performance, nor did they drive any of the observed repeatable differences among individuals. These results support the hypothesis that our assays captured intrinsic differences in inhibitory control. Instead of throwing the detour task out with the bathwater, we suggest confounds are likely system and experimental-design specific, and that assays for this potentially fundamental but largely overlooked source of behavioural plasticity in animal populations, should be validated and refined for each study system.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Inhibitory control, personality, and manipulated ecological conditions influence foraging plasticity in the great tit
J. R. Coomes, G. L. Davidson, … J. L. Quinn·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2020
- Response learning confounds accurate assays of inhibitory control
J. O. van Horik, C. E. Beardsworth, … J. R. Madden·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2019
- Learning and motor inhibitory control in crows and domestic chickens
C. A. F. Wascher, K. Allen, G. Szipl·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2020
- No evidence for cross-contextual consistency in spatial learning and behavioural flexibility in a passerine
C. A. Troisi, A. C. Cooke, … J. L. Quinn·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2020
- Tit wit: environmental and genetic drivers of cognitive variation along an urbanization gradient
Megan J. Thompson, Laura Gervais, … Anne Charmantier·Animal CognitionPeer-reviewed·Jul 3, 2025
- Social influences on delayed gratification in New Caledonian crows and Eurasian jays
R. Miller, J. Davies, … N. S. Clayton·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2023