Nature CommunicationsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Dopamine transients delivered in learning contexts do not act as model-free prediction errors
Melissa J. SharpeiD, Hannah M. BatcheloriD, Lauren E. MuelleriD, Chun Yun Chang, Etienne J. P. MaesiD, Yael NiviD, Geoffrey M. SchoenbaumiD
Abstract
Dopamine neurons fire transiently in response to unexpected rewards. These neural correlates are proposed to signal the reward prediction error described in model-free reinforcement learning algorithms. This error term represents the unpredicted or excess value of the rewarding event. In model-free reinforcement learning, this value is then stored as part of the learned value of any antecedent cues, contexts or events, making them intrinsically valuable, independent of the specific rewarding event that caused the prediction error. In support of equivalence between dopamine transients and this model-free error term, proponents cite causal optogenetic studies showing that artificially induced dopamine transients cause lasting changes in behavior. Yet none of these studies directly demonstrate the presence of cached value under conditions appropriate for associative learning. To address this gap in our knowledge, we conducted three studies where we optogenetically activated dopamine neurons while rats were learning associative relationships, both with and without reward. In each experiment, the antecedent cues failed to acquired value and instead entered into value-independent associative relationships with the other cues or rewards. These results show that dopamine transients, constrained within appropriate learning situations, support valueless associative learning.
- Citations
- 89
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- "Learning in reverse: Dopamine errors drive excitatory and inhibitory components of backward conditioning in an outcome-specific manner".
Benjamin M. Seitz, Ivy B. Hoang, … Melissa J. Sharpe·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2022
- Rethinking dopamine as generalized prediction error
Matthew Gardner, Geoffrey M. Schoenbaum, Samuel Joseph Gershman·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2018
- Rewarding Value or Prediction Error: Settling the debate over the role of dopamine in reward learning
Alexandra A Usypchuk, Etienne J. P. Maes, … Mihaela D Iordanova·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2025
- Dopamine transients encode reward prediction errorsindependent of learning rates
Andrew Mah, Carla E. M. Golden, Christine M. Constantinople·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2024
- Striatal dopamine release reflects a domain-general prediction error
Kauê Machado Costa, Nishika Raheja, … Geoffrey M. Schoenbaum·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2023
- Action prediction error: a value-free dopaminergic teaching signal that drives stable learning
Francesca Greenstreet, Hernando Martínez Vergara, … Marcus Stephenson‐Jones·NaturePeer-reviewed·May 14, 2025