henhaobio
Sign in

Current BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Rewarding Value or Prediction Error: Settling the debate over the role of dopamine in reward learning

Alexandra A Usypchuk, Etienne J. P. MaesiD, Megan LozziiD, Dimitrios K. AvramidisiD, Geoffrey M. SchoenbaumiD, Guillem R. EsberiD, Matthew GardneriD, Mihaela D IordanovaiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

The discovery that DA transients can be mapped onto the reward prediction errors in temporal difference models is a pinnacle achievement of neuroscience. Yet, there is abundant evidence that DA activity reinforces actions, suggesting it serves as an intrinsically rewarding event. These two possibilities are so conceptually intertwined that it is not surprising that they have been so far experimentally conflated. Here, using computational modeling, behavioural blocking and optogenetics, we show that stimulating VTA DA neurons promotes learning even when a natural reward and DA stimulation are held constant across the learning phases of blocking. These findings provide strong evidence in favour of the prediction error hypothesis rather than encoding the rewarding value of appetitive events.

Citations
5
FWCI
1.56
Field percentile
top 17%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISPan-Vazquez '25Keiflin '18Seitz '22Bakhurin '23Matsumoto '24Aquili '20
84% semantic matchNeuroscience