Moving pictures: Reassessing docking experiments with a dynamic view of protein interfaces
Abstract
The modeling of protein assemblies at the atomic level remains a central issue in structural biology, as protein interactions play a key role in numerous cellular processes. This problem is traditionally addressed using docking tools, where the quality of the models is based on their similarity to a single reference experimental structure. However, using a static reference does not take into account the dynamic quality of the protein interface. Here, we used all-atom classical Molecular Dynamics simulations to investigate the stability of the reference interface for three complexes that previously served as targets in the CAPRI competition. For each one of these targets, we also ran MD simulations for ten models that are distributed over the High, Medium and Acceptable accuracy categories. To assess the quality of these models from a dynamic perspective, we set up new criteria which take into account the stability of the reference experimental protein interface. We show that, when the protein interfaces are allowed to evolve along time, the original ranking based on the static CAPRI criteria no longer holds as over 50% of the docking models undergo a category change (which can be either toward a better or a lower accuracy group) when reassessing their quality using dynamic information. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=89 SRC="FIGDIR/small/415885v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (9K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e4f4a8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7a4bccorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1064caforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@948619_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Native or non-native protein-protein docking models? Molecular dynamics to the rescue.
Zuzana Jandová, Attilio Vittorio Vargiu, Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin·Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationPeer-reviewed·Aug 3, 2021
- DynaPIN: A Tool for Characterizing Dynamic Protein Interfaces
Ayşe Berçin Barlas, Atakan Özsan, … Ezgi Karaca·Journal of Molecular BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 7, 2026
- A rugged binding landscape unifies static and dynamic paradigms in protein-protein interactions
Te Liu, Sichao Huang, … Bin Sun·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2026
- Protein-protein docking with large-scale backbone flexibility using coarse-grained Monte-Carlo simulations
Mateusz Kurciński, Sebastian Kmiecik, … Andrzej Koliński·International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jul 8, 2021
- ProteinDock: A physics-informed layer to improve protein-protein docking reliability
Gowrish Rajagopal, Soren C. Spina, … Blaise R. Kimmel·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2026
- DockQ v2: Improved automatic quality measure for protein multimers, nucleic acids, and small molecules
Claudio Mirabello, Björn Wallner·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2024