eNeuroNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Deficits in forelimb reach learning in a mouse model of Fragile X syndrome
Leanne F. YoungiD, Ann DerhamiD, Rui ZhuiD, Aparna SuvrathaniD
Abstract
Fragile X syndrome is a leading cause of intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder, for which therapies are limited. A mouse model of Fragile X syndrome, the Fmr1 knockout (KO) mouse, has been particularly valuable for interrogating the molecular, cellular, and circuit mechanisms that underlie the neurological deficits seen in this syndrome. Key deficits in Fragile X syndrome include impairments in social behaviors, cognition, and motor learning. Given the difficulties in extrapolating more complex human behaviors to mouse models, simple motor behaviors are a particularly tractable form of learning to study in the mouse. We investigated a form of forelimb reach learning in Fmr1 KO mice, precisely quantifying different parameters of the task using both manual analysis and DeepLabCut-based tracking of reach trajectories. While Fmr1 KO mice show impaired learning overall, our results demonstrated that the presence or absence of a cue that signals reward alleviates some of the deficits. In addition to a single metric of success in learning, we determined the specific parameters of the motor behavior that were responsible for that success or failure. In particular, our results suggested that Fmr1 KO mice showed impaired improvement in the trajectory of the reach, reflected by a greater likelihood of completely missing the target, and in a lower learning index for the optimal reach trajectory. In addition, we fully described the features underlying learning, including categorizing the first attempt during trials, failed reaches where mice make contact with the reward, the number of trials where no attempts were made, as well as how the pattern of these different behaviors varies in Fmr1 KO mice. Our findings provide an essential framework for linking specific behavioral impairments in motor learning to the cellular and circuit mechanisms that support them.
- organism: mouse
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: trajectory inference
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Field percentile
- top 10%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Systemic pharmacological suppression of neural activity reverses learning impairment in a mouse model of Fragile X syndrome
Amin Md Shakhawat, Jacqueline G Foltz, … Jennifer L Raymond·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2023
- Impaired hippocampal representation of place in the Fmr1-knockout mouse model of Fragile X syndrome
T. Arbab, C. M. Pennartz, F. P. Battaglia·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2017
- Impaired perceptual learning in Fragile X syndrome is mediated by parvalbumin neuron dysfunction in V1 and is reversible.
Anubhuti Goel, Daniel A. Cantu, … Carlos Portera‐Cailliau·bioRxiv·Nov 13, 2017
- The role of Fragile X in the control of vertebrate spinal cord networks
Jonathan J. Milla-Cruz, Abel Mebrahtu, … Patrick J. Whelan·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2026
- Hyperexcitability in the olfactory bulb and impaired fine odor discrimination in the Fmr1 KO mouse model of fragile X syndrome
Praveen Kuruppath, Xue Lin, … Nathan E. Schoppa·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 3, 2023
- Early-life Oxytocin Rescues Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity and Episodic Memory in a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome
Jasmine Chavez, Aliza A. Le, … Christine M. Gall·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2024