Transcranial magnetic vs intracranial electric stimulation: a direct comparison of their effects via scalp EEG recordings
Renzo ComolattiiD, Gabriel HassaniD, Ezequiel MikulaniD, Simone RussoiD, Michele A. Colombo, Elisabetta Litterio, Giulia FurregoniiD, Sasha D’AmbrosioiD, Matteo FecchioiD, Sara ParmigianiiD, Ivana SartoriiD, Silvia CasarottoiD, Andrea PigoriniiD, Marcello MassiminiiD
Abstract
BackgroundSingle-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Intracranial Electrical Stimulation (IES) are widely used to probe cortical excitability and connectivity, but their electrophysiological effects have never been compared. ObjectiveThis study aims to fill this gap by using high-density scalp electroencephalogram (hd-EEG) as a common read-out to compare human brain responses to TMS and IES. MethodsThe dataset includes TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) acquired from healthy subjects (n=22) and IES-evoked potentials (IEPs) recorded from drug-resistant epileptic patients (n=31) during wakefulness. In a subset of subjects TEPs (n=12) and IEPs (n=13) were also recorded during NREM sleep. Amplitude, spectral, and spatiotemporal features of TMS and IES responses, as well as their estimated electrical fields, were compared. ResultsWe observed marked differences between TMS and IES responses. During wakefulness, IEPs are considerably larger, slower and associated with a suppression of cortical activity, whereas TEPs are characterized by multiple waves of recurrent activation. These differences are attenuated during NREM, during which both TMS and IES elicit large EEG responses associated with a prominent suppression of cortical activity. At the global level, the spatiotemporal complexity of the responses to both TMS and IES decreases consistently following the transition from wakefulness to NREM sleep. ConclusionDespite the limitations due to different subject populations (healthy vs pathological), our findings provide a first reference to parallel non-invasive and invasive brain stimulation and to interpret their differential effects. They also offer important insight on how cortical responsiveness is shaped by inhibition and adaptation mechanisms depending on input parameters and brain states. Highlights- IES evokes higher signal-to-noise EEG responses than TMS. - IES responses are larger, slower, and lead to cortical suppression. - TMS elicits faster recurrent waves, with no suppression during wakefulness. - Both TMS and IES converge to similar patterns during NREM sleep.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Field percentile
- top 13%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Immediate TMS-EEG responses reveal motor cortex excitability
Antonietta Stango, Agnese Zazio, … Marta Bortoletto·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 19, 2025
- The correspondence between EMG and EEG measures of changes in cortical excitability following transcranial magnetic stimulation
Mana Biabani, Alex Fornito, … Nigel C. Rogasch·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2021
- Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on the human brain recorded with intracranial electrocorticography: First-in-human study
Jeffrey B. Wang, Joel Bruss, … Aaron D. Boes·bioRxiv·Jan 18, 2022
- Immediate cortical responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor leg area
Mikkel Malling Beck, Marten Nuyts, … Lasse Christiansen·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2026
- The spatiotemporal evolution of TMS-evoked potentials reflects direct cortical activation
Matteo Fecchio, Simone Russo, … Mario Rosanova·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2025
- Pinging the Brain with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Cortical Reactivity in Time and Space
Sangtae Ahn, Flavio Frӧhlich·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2021