bioRxivAnimal Behavior & CognitionPreprint
Standard touchscreen test procedures shift circadian rhythms in mice: a modified protocol to minimize circadian confounds
Alice I Ayres, Taha Yildirim, Samantha Saw, Mateusz Michalik, Lea Paty, Mayuko Arai, Robert Gibson, Ralph Mistlberger, Brianne A KentiD
Abstract
Touchscreen based cognitive testing for rodents offers considerable experimental benefits, including a semi automated battery approach and the use of appetitive rather than aversive reinforcement. However, food reward and touchscreen illumination introduce potential confounds, as both food and light can shift, entrain, or disrupt circadian rhythms, which in turn can affect learning and memory. The potential for the test apparatus to impact endogenous circadian rhythms is particularly problematic when probing relationships between sleep, circadian disruption, and cognitive performance. After observing phase shifting of circadian rhythms in nocturnal mice tested using standard touchscreen test procedures, which include testing during the active period (early lights off), we evaluated the relative contributions of the illuminated screen and the appetitive food reward. Our results indicate that light emitted by the touchscreen chambers is responsible for the circadian phase shifting effects, with standard screen conditions inducing a ~3.5 h phase delay in daily activity rhythms when training is conducted early in the dark period for 7 consecutive days. We then modified lighting in the test environment and the home cage to identify parameters that would minimize circadian shifting without impairing visual discrimination or performance on a widely used cognitive test (Trial Unique Nonmatching to Location, TUNL). From the 10 conditions tested, we offer specific recommendations for modifying touchscreen test protocols to minimize circadian confounds, without impacting task acquisition or performance.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Optimizing touchscreen measures of rodent cognition by eliminating image bias
J. A. Belarde, C. W. Chen, … C. M. Troy·bioRxiv·Apr 5, 2021
- Circadian timing does not modulate human temporal contrast sensitivity
Hannah Sophie Heinrichs, Manuel Spitschan·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2025
- Dissociating the Effects of Light at Night from Circadian Misalignment in a Neurodevelopmental Disorder Mouse Model Using Ultradian Light-Dark Cycles.
Sophia Anne Marie B. Villanueva, Huei Bin Wang, … Christopher Scott Colwell·Clocks & SleepPeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2025
- Effects of calibrated blue-yellow (-S+) changes in light on the human circadian clock
Christine Blume, Christian Cajochen, … Manuel Spitschan·Nature Human BehaviourPeer-reviewed·Dec 22, 2023
- Optogenetic activation of parabrachial tachykinin1 neurons drives nonphotic circadian entrainment
Victor Y. Zhang, Sekun Park, … Horacio O. de la Iglesia·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2026
- Light effects on circadian and homeostatic regulation: alertness increases independent of time awake.
Renske Lok, Tom Woelders, … Roelof A. Hut·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2020