Assessing the defensive behaviour of Apis mellifera scutellata in its native range reveals its variability, organization and persistence
Daniela M. Ramírez-MorenoiD, Max Fritzler, Ann-Kathrin PohleiD, Kavitha KannaniD, Emily Rose Lippman, James Charles NiehiD, K. BalkwilliD, Morgane NouvianiD
Abstract
Colony defence is critical for the survival of wild honeybees but presents a challenge for local populations and beekeepers. Apis mellifera scutellata is an important pollinator in its native range, a large area of Southern and Eastern Africa 1, but is reputed for its explosive temperament. Here, we present data demonstrating that this behaviour is only exhibited by a small fraction of colonies, while others are relatively docile. This sheds new light on this subspecies and on its likely evolutionary trajectory. We further characterize the different elements of this defensive response and compare them to that of A. m. carnica and A. m. mellifera. We show that each subspecies invests differently in the two steps of the behavioural sequence (alert and attack). Furthermore, our results suggest that the task of attacking is carried out by specialized workers in carnica, but not in the other subspecies tested, highlighting subtle differences in colony organization across subspecies. Finally, we discovered that defenders from A. m. scutellata and scutellata-hybrid colonies can locate a target that was stung up to 2 h and 3 h earlier, respectively, whereas European bees could only do so for 30 min. This long-term marking could confer an advantage against returning predators with few weak points, such as honey badgers and humans wearing protective clothing. Overall, we offer a fresh perspective on this controversial but important subspecies of honeybees, with implications for both future studies and daily management.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparing the appetitive learning performance of six European honeybee subspecies in a common apiary
R. Scheiner, K. Lim, … M. S. Gabel·bioRxiv·Jul 14, 2021
- Morphological changes in the mandibles accompany the defensive behavior of Indiana mite biting honey bees against Varroa destructor
J. Smith, X. L. Cleare, … H. Li-Byarlay·bioRxiv·Dec 7, 2020
- The dominant axes of lifetime behavioral variation in honey bees
M. L. Smith, J. Davidson, … I. D. Couzin·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2021
- Comparative scototaxis among four honey bee species
Yiheng Cai, Fang Liu, … Zhi Huang·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2026
- Odorant cues linked to social immunity induce lateralized antenna stimulation in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)
A. McAfee, T. F. Collins, … L. J. Foster·bioRxiv·Nov 15, 2016
- Postural analysis reveals persistent vigilance in paper wasps after conspecific challenge
A. W. Legan, C. C. Vogt, M. J. Sheehan·bioRxiv·May 25, 2022