bioRxivScientific Communication & EducationPreprint
Supporting Student Learning and Experiences in the Lab: (How) Should We Design Their Groups?
Abstract
Undergraduate science students spend a substantial amount of time working in their laboratory groups, and instructors want to make evidence-based decisions on how to best set up these groups. Despite several studies on group composition, the evidence appears to be quite context-specific, and very little has been published about lab groups. Further, many studies focus solely on conceptual learning; however, the lab is an important venue for also supporting non-content outcomes such as confidence, process skills, team skills, and attitudes. Thus, in our introductory course on molecules, cells, and physiology we were interested in the impact of group composition, on a spread of student outcomes. Students were either placed into groups by the instructor, or self-selected into groups. To assess the impact of group composition on student outcome, we collected pre/post data from >500 students over 2 semesters. Our measures assess conceptual knowledge, confidence in lab skills, attitudes toward group learning, lab grades, gender, year of study, and (via open-ended questions) student perspectives. Using a multiple regression approach, we established models that predict student outcomes based on their individual attributes and on their lab group attributes. Surprisingly, the hetero/homogeneity of the initial group, and whether the groups were student- or instructor-selected, did not affect student outcomes in these models. Further MANCOVA analysis demonstrated that student interaction outside of the lab time was the strongest predictor of positive student attitudes toward group learning. Student perspectives on group formation are mixed, and suggest that a simple and flexible choice approach may best support our students. Overall, these findings have clear implications for our course design and instructional choices: we should focus our efforts to promote positive student interactions, rather than worrying about initial composition.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Are they funny? Associations between instructors humor and student emotions in undergraduate lab courses
Zarae A. Allen, Christopher James Zajic, … Trevor T. Tuma·Journal of Microbiology and Biology EducationPeer-reviewed·Nov 7, 2025
- Seeing isn't believing? Mixed effects of a perspective-getting intervention to improve mentoring relationships for science doctoral students
Trevor T. Tuma, Heather Noel Fedesco, … Erin L. Dolan·CBE—Life Sciences EducationPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2025
- A Cross-Platform Comparison of Student’s Perceptions of the Learning Environment in an Introductory Microbiology Course
Melissa V. Ramirez, Virginia S. Lee, … Alice M. Lee·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2018
- Randomized controlled studies comparing traditional lectures versus online modules
K. Musunuru, Z. P. Machanda, … W. J. Anderson·bioRxiv·Jan 18, 2021
- Influence of non-content instructor talk on students' motivation-related outcomes in laboratory courses
Christopher James Zajic, Erin L. Dolan·bioRxiv·May 15, 2026
- Enhancing Secondary School Students' Attitudes towards Biology through Guided Inquiry-Based Lab Instructions
Ashebir Mekonnen Chengere, Beyene Dobo, … Kedir Woliy·bioRxiv·May 29, 2025