Seeing isn't believing? Mixed effects of a perspective-getting intervention to improve mentoring relationships for science doctoral students
Trevor T. TumaiD, Heather Noel FedescoiD, Emily Q. RosenzweigiD, Xiao‐Yin CheniD, Erin L. DolaniD
Abstract
Science doctoral students can experience negative interactions with faculty mentors and internalize these experiences, potentially leading to self-blame and undermining their research self-efficacy. Helping students perceive these interactions adaptively may protect their research self-efficacy and maintain functional mentoring relationships. We conducted a pre-registered, longitudinal field experiment of a novel perspective-getting intervention combined with attribution retraining to help students avoid self-blame and preserve research self-efficacy. Science doctoral students (n = 155) were randomly assigned to read about mentor perspectives on negative interactions (i.e., Perspective-getting Condition) or about mentoring with no mentor perspective (i.e., control condition). Contrary to our hypotheses, we found no main effects of the intervention on students self-blame or research self-efficacy. However, for students with lower pre-intervention mentorship relationship satisfaction, the intervention preserved research self-efficacy six months later. This study provides evidence that perspective getting may be protective for students who are most in need of relationship intervention. Educational Relevance and Implications StatementEffective mentoring relationships are fundamental for promoting the success of doctoral students in science, yet not all mentoring relationships are high quality. This study assessed the effectiveness of a brief perspective-getting intervention (where students are given the perspective of what it is like to be a research mentor) that aimed to protect science doctoral students from blaming themselves for negative interactions with faculty mentors and maintain their research self-efficacy. Results showed that on average across all students, the intervention did not affect students self-blame for negative interactions or their research self-efficacy. However, the intervention did help students with less satisfying mentoring relationships maintain their self-efficacy. Thus, perspective-getting shows some promise for protecting science doctoral students from harm that can be caused by negative interactions with faculty mentors.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Field percentile
- top 15%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Development and field test of an intervention to reduce conflict in faculty-doctoral student mentoring relationships
Trevor T. Tuma, Emily Q. Rosenzweig, … Erin L. Dolan·bioRxiv·Jan 29, 2026
- Advancing the Conceptualization and Measurement of Mentorship: The Mentoring Experiences in Research & Graduate Education (MERGE) Scale
Trevor T. Tuma, Melissa M. Robertson, Erin L. Dolan·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2026
- Evaluation of the Utility of a Research Ethics Training Course to Graduate Students
Michael D. Schaller, Peter H. Mathers·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2025
- Study buddy learning is associated with academic success in undergraduate science courses
Achol Jones, Gabrielle Reznik, … James T. Enns·Journal of Microbiology and Biology EducationPeer-reviewed·Oct 16, 2026
- Development and Validation of the Mentoring in Undergraduate Research Survey
L. B. Limeri, N. T. Carter, … E. L. Dolan·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2023
- Mentoring practices predictive of doctoral student outcomes in a biological sciences cohort
R. Debray, E. A. Dewald-Wang, K. Ennis·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2023