A data-driven framework for the selection and validation of digital health metrics: use-case in neurological sensorimotor impairments
Christoph M. KanzleriD, Mike D. RinderknechtiD, Anne SchwarziD, Ilse LamersiD, Cynthia GagnoniD, Jeremia P. O. HeldiD, Peter FeysiD, Andreas Rüdiger LuftiD, Roger GassertiD, Olivier LambercyiD
Abstract
BackgroundDetailed assessments of upper limb disability are essential to understand and monitor sensorimotor recovery. Usually, multiple timeconsuming assessments are required to define a holistic sensorimotor profile of proximal (shoulder-elbow) and distal (wrist-hand) impairments and their impact on the capacity to perform activities. We propose and evaluate a novel physiologically-motivated computational framework for objectively assessing sensorimotor profiles in neurological patients using a single, rapid technology-based assessment involving goal-directed arm and hand movements. MethodsThe Virtual Peg Insertion Test (VPIT) was administered to 121 healthy and 80 neurological subjects. The framework provides 25 kinematic and kinetic metrics expected to describe 12 sensorimotor components representative of ataxia and paresis and their influence on task performance, as well as one overall disability measure. The feasibility (protocol duration), structural validity (factor analysis and correlations{rho} between sensorimotor components), concurrent validity (correlation with Action Research Arm Test; ARAT), and discriminant validity (comparing healthy controls and patients, and patients with different disability levels) were evaluated. ResultsThe median VPIT protocol duration was 16.5min in neurological patients. The sensor-based metrics could unambiguously be grouped into 12 mostly independent (median |{rho}|=0.14) components. Ten components showed significant differences between healthy and impaired subjects and nine components indicated clear trends across disability levels, without any ceiling effects. The VPIT overall disability measure and ARAT were moderately correlated ({rho}=-0.53, p<0.001). ConclusionsThis work demonstrates the possibility to rapidly, holistically, and objectively assess proximal and distal sensorimotor impairments and their influence on the capacity to perform activities with a single assessment.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 58
- FWCI
- 4.57
- Field percentile
- top 4%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Technology-aided assessment of functionally relevant sensorimotor impairments in arm and hand of post-stroke individuals
Christoph M. Kanzler, Anne Schwarz, … Olivier Lambercy·Journal of NeuroEngineering and RehabilitationPeer-reviewed·Sep 25, 2020
- A Framework for Sensor-based Assessment of Upper-limb Functioning
A. David, T. Subash, … S. Balasubramanian·bioRxiv·Feb 10, 2021
- Do we perform as well as we think we do? A systematic scoping review of self-evaluation of upper-extremity motor performance
Lucas D. Crosby, Gabriela Rozanski, … Kara K. Patterson·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2022
- Validity and reliability of Kinect v2 for quantifying upper body kinematics during seated reaching
- Modeling the assessment of the upper limb motor function impairment in children with cerebral palsy using sEMG and IMU sensors
S. Raouafi, M. Raison, S. Achiche·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2019
- Comparing Robotic and Computer Vision Assessments of Unilateral and Bilateral Reaching in Healthy Adults
Desmond Asante, Shelby Ziccardi, … Rachel L. Hawe·Smart HealthPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2025