Measurement Quality Metrics to Improve Absolute Microbial Cell Counting
Kirsten H. ParrattiD, David C. NewtoniD, Joy P. DunkersiD, Jennifer N. Dootz, Monique E. HunteriD, Alshae’ Logan-JacksoniD, L. PierceiD, Sumona SarkariD, Stephanie L. ServetasiD, Nancy J. LiniD
Abstract
Total and viable microbial cell counts are increasingly important for applications including live biotherapeutic products, food safety, and probiotics. In microbiology, cells are quantified using methods such as colony forming unit (CFU), flow cytometry, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), but different methods measure different aspects of the cells (measurands), and results may not be directly comparable across methods. In the absence of a ground-truth reference material for cell count, one cannot quantify the accuracy of any cell counting method, which limits method performance assessments and comparisons. Herein, a modified analysis of cell counting methods based on the ISO 20391-2:2019 standard was developed and demonstrated for microbial cell samples diluted over a log-scale range of concentrations. Escherichia coli samples ranging in concentration from approximately 5 x 105 cells/mL to 2 x 107 cells/mL were quantified using CFU, Coulter principle, fluorescence flow cytometry, and impedance flow cytometry. Quality metrics modified from the ISO standard were calculated for each method and shown to be repeatable across replicate experiments. The quality metrics illustrate large differences in proportionality and variability across methods, with total cell counts in good agreement and viable cell count having more variability. As the ISO standard is meant to guide fit-for-purpose method selection, interpretation of the results and quality metrics can drive method choice and optimization. The framework introduced here will help researchers select fit-for-purpose counting methods for quantification of microbial total and viable cells across a range of applications.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.86
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Robust Estimation of Bacterial Cell Count from Optical Density
Jacob Beal, Natalie G. Farny, … Dror Aizik·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2020
- Semi-automated vs. manual: Comparative study of cell culture counting methods using validation parameters
Selina Uhlendorff, Ulrich Odefey, … Miriam Pein‐Hackelbusch·Chemie Ingenieur TechnikPeer-reviewed·Nov 7, 2025
- General calibration of microbial growth in microplate readers
Keiran Stevenson, Alexander F McVey, … Teuta Pilizota·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2016
- Flow cytometry method for absolute counting and single-cell phenotyping of mycobacteria
D. A. Barr, C. O. Omollo, … G. R. Davies·bioRxiv·May 1, 2021
- Evaluation of flow cytometry for cell count and detection of bacteria in biological fluids.
N. C. DOSSOU, I. GAUBERT, … D. MALANDAIN·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2021
- Bivariate confidence probability plots as a method to test the accuracy and variability of microbiological measures
A. Monleon Getino, AC Marca Home Care·bioRxiv·Nov 18, 2020