Comment on "Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions"
Abstract
Tomasetti and Vogelstein (Science 347, 78-81, 2015) claimed that \"primary prevention measures are not likely to be very effective\" for many cancers because they arise mostly from random mutations fixed during stem cell division, independently of specific genetic or environmental factors. We demonstrate that their calculation for hepatocellular carcinomas overlooked a major subset of tumors proven to be preventable through vaccination. The problem, which is not limited to hepatocellular carcinoma, arises from the general reliance of their analysis on average USA incidences and the omission of incidences in specific risk groups.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Adaptive Cancer Suppression among Tissues through Reduced Stem Cell Mutation Rates
Jack da Silva·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2026
- A lottery simulation model for predicting cancer risk based on the strength and abundance of individual mutations
Alexander J Wolfe, Adam Giangreco·bioRxiv·Nov 15, 2016
- Hierarchical tissue organization as a general mechanism to limit the accumulation of somatic mutations
I. Derenyi, G. J. Szollosi·bioRxiv·Jan 4, 2017
- Dynamics of preventive and reactive cancer control using low-impact treatments
Andrei R. R. Akhmetzhanov, Michael E. Hochberg·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2015
- When will the cancer start? Elucidating the correlations between cancer initiation times and lifetime cancer risks
H. Teimouri, M. Kochugaeva, A. B. Kolomeisky·bioRxiv·May 17, 2019
- Estimating stem cell fractions in hierarchically organized tumors
Benjamin Werner, Jacob G Scott, … Philipp M Altrock·Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewed·Mar 31, 2016