Scientific ReportsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Influence of fecal collection conditions and 16S rRNA gene sequencing protocols at two centers on human gut microbiota analysis
Jocelyn Sietsma PeningtoniD, Megan A. S. PennoiD, Katrina NguiiD, Nadim J. AjamiiD, Alexandra J. Roth‐SchulzeiD, Stephen Wilcox, Esther Bandala‐SancheziD, John M. WentworthiD, Simon Charles BarryiD, Cheryl Y. BrowniD, Jennifer CouperiD, Joseph F. PetrosinoiD, Anthony T. PapenfussiD, Leonard C. HarrisoniD, ENDIA Study Group*, Peter Grahame ColmaniD, Andrew M. Cotterill, Maria E. CraigiD, Elizabeth Ann DavisiD, Mark Anglin HarrisiD, Aveni HaynesiD, Lynne C. GilesiD, Grant MorahaniD, Claire Morbey, William D. RawlinsoniD, , Peter VuillerminiD
Abstract
BackgroundTo optimise fecal sampling and analysis yielding reproducible microbiome data, and gain further insight into sources of its variation, we compared different collection conditions and 16S rRNA gene sequencing protocols in two centers. Fecal samples were collected on three sequential days from six healthy adults and placed in commercial collection tubes (OMNIgeneGut OMR-200) at room temperature or in sterile 5 ml screw-top tubes in a home fridge or home freezer for 6-24 h, before transfer at 4{degrees}C to the laboratory and storage at - 80{degrees}C within 24 hours. Replicate samples were shipped on dry ice to centers in Australia and the USA for DNA extraction and sequencing of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene, using different PCR protocols. Sequences were analysed with the QIIME pipeline and Greengenes database at the Australian center and with an in-house pipeline and SILVA database at the USA center.\n\nResultsVariation in gut microbiome composition and diversity was dominated by differences between individuals. Minor differences in the abundance of taxa were found between collection-processing methods and day of collection. Larger differences were evident between the two centers, including in the relative abundances of genus Akkermansia, in phylum Verrucomicrobiales, and Bifidobacteria in Actinobacteria.\n\nConclusionsCollection with storage and transport at 4{degrees}C within 24 h is adequate for 16S rRNA analysis of the gut microbiome. However, variation between sequencing centers suggests that cohort samples should be sequenced by the same method in one center. Differences in handling, shipping and methods of PCR gene amplification and sequence analysis in different centers introduce variation in ways that are not fully understood. These findings are particularly relevant as microbiome studies shift towards larger population-based and multicenter studies.
- Citations
- 73
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Field percentile
- top 9%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Variations of gut microbiome profile under different storage conditions and preservation periods: A multi-dimensional evaluation
- Rapidly processed stool swabs approximate stool microbiota profiles
N. A. Bokulich, J. Maldonado, … J. G. Caporaso·bioRxiv·Jan 18, 2019
- Effect size of delayed freezing, diurnal variation, and hindgut location on the mouse fecal microbiome relative to a standardized biological variable
K. L. Gustafson, Z. L. McAdams, … A. C. Ericsson·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2023
- Stability of Oral and Fecal Microbiome at Room Temperature: Impact on Diversity
B. Rius-Sansalvador, D. Bars-Cortina, … M. Obon-Santacana·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2023
- Standardization of laboratory practices for the study of the human gut microbiome
Jolanda Kool, Liza Tymchenko, … Susana Fuentes·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2022
- Measures of reproducibility in sampling and laboratory processing methods in high-throughput microbiome analysis
Patricia Vera-Wolf, Juan P. Cárdenas, … Zachary S Apte·bioRxiv·May 15, 2018